Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

White Coat Underground

Musings on the intersection of science, medicine, and culture

Profile


PalMD is a practicing internist in the Great Lakes region of the U.S.. Aside from the great joy he finds in his family and his work, he likes communicating some of that joy to others. He has a special interest in the ways patients---and we are all patients at one time or another---are deceived by charlatans. He aims to change the world, one reader at a time. Previous writings can still be found here, and here. I also write twice a month for Science-Based Medicine

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.


Subscribe to my feed today!

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Just a bit more on Merry Xmas | Main | More dangerous naturopathic nonsense »

Naturopaths getting it wrong in Canada

Category: Absurd medical claimsMedicine
Posted on: December 14, 2009 1:18 PM, by PalMD

Over at Skeptic North there has been an ongoing discussion about naturopathy. Since it looks like naturopaths are going to get prescribing privileges in Ontario, it's reasonable to subject their practice to some pretty intense scrutiny. One naturopath left some interesting comments about treatment of heart disease, citing relevant literature, but failed to show an actual understanding of the clinical realities of treating heart disease. This is not surprising given that naturopaths aren't required to do residencies like real doctors are.

Another comment referenced the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors (CAND) information statement on swine flu (the original was apparently pulled down by CAND. Here is a copy). Its idiocy was downright surreal. It read like a fifth grader's poorly done book report. It is not only incorrect, but internally inconsistent. For example:

There is no research that can predict who is at risk and who is not.

Followed by:

The following groups are considered to be more at risk from the current H1N1 virus...

They also list "naturopathic" prevention strategies which include hygiene such as hand washing and avoiding sick people. What's "naturopathic" about that?

And it wouldn't really be crappy medical advice without recommending "boosting the immune system", in this case with stretching, "dry skin brushing", and other nonsense. Without a shred of irony, they mention that mortality due to this flu may be tied to an "over-reaction" of the immune system.

For a comparison, take a look at some actual medical sites.

The only mention of vaccination in the CAND document is in a negative context. The other documents recognize that the H1N1 flu vaccine is the most effective way to prevent infection. This is an inexcusable failure on the part of CAND.

And just for laughs, if you're interested in virology, their introductory paragraph on the putative origins of the current pandemic is completely wrong.

This patient information document betrays a complete lack of understanding of science and medicine and adds to the already considerable evidence that naturopaths shouldn't be allowed to lay their hands (clinically) on anyone---ever.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/127142

Comments

1

Though I don't live in Ontario, I do live in Canada, so I e-mailed Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty as well as the premiers of the opposition Conservative and New Democratic parties to register my disappointment and distress about this bill. Seems like the least I could do.

Posted by: Dan | December 14, 2009 3:35 PM

2

This sentence was rich just because of the botched punctuation:

The H1N1 influenza virus has not mutated between the first and second wave indicating that it will, in all likelihood remain a mild to moderate disease.

Ugh. They would have been best without any comma. If they are going to put a comma there, they need one after likelihood. Which is fine, people have trouble with commas, but because of the phrasing here, I initially parsed it like this: "The H1N1 influenza virus has not mutated between the first and second wave, indicating that it will [mutate]." heh...


And of course, the co-opting of legitimate preventative strategies and then calling them "naturopathic" is really annoying.

Posted by: James Sweet | December 14, 2009 3:35 PM

3

Hmm, only 2 comments? I guess no one cares.

Posted by: DrWonderful | December 14, 2009 7:31 PM

4

Dr. Wonderful? More like "Dr" troll...

Posted by: MitoScientist | December 14, 2009 8:06 PM

5

ugh. It feels like we're hitting a science low-point with our PM actually wanting to to lower emission standards, and our premier wanting to lower health and medical standards. Makes you wonder if they're holding a grudge against their grade school science teachers.

Posted by: Daniel J. Andrews | December 14, 2009 9:14 PM

6

Per: "[naturopaths'] complete lack of understanding of science and medicine [...] naturopaths shouldn't be allowed to lay their hands (clinically) on anyone -- ever."

My internal history with naturopathy is completely consistent.

-r.c.

Posted by: daijiyobu | December 14, 2009 10:10 PM

7

It feels like we're hitting a science low-point

It's probably due to all the US-American immigrants you got during the Bush administration lowering science standards. Beware of immigrants from the south...

Posted by: Dianne | December 14, 2009 10:31 PM

8

Dr.Wonderless,
just because you don't care about Canadian legislation giving charlatans prescribing rights and it's dangerous repercussions on health care doesn't mean nobody does.

Besides, 2 articles on the subject in a national newspaper and published online resulted in 120+ comments in a 24h comment period limit, averaging 1 comment every 5-15mins. How d'you figure that one?;)


For those wanting to read those posts:

from Scott Garuva (RPh), arguing against ND prescribing:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/24/scott-gavura-naturopathy-a-prescription-for-quackery.aspx


From two NDs, arguing for:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/27/counterpoint-no-magic-involved-in-naturopathic-medicine.aspx

This last post got owned from the many comments...quite an entertaining read...

Dianne: STFU. Seriously.

Posted by: avicenna | December 15, 2009 12:04 AM

9

Dominionists? In my medical science? It's more likely than you think!

But not just dominionists. You will find a coalition of Moonies, Scientologists, and dominionists all working together to inject supernaturalism into systems of social authority around the globe.

Poor Discovery Institute. High school biology teachers proved a tough nut to crack. However on the healthcare front, Bravewell and the toxin busters have made great strides.

Wait, you say. Moonies, Scientologists, and Dominionists have profound theological differences. No way they can work together.

Well have a look at OT VIIs John Coale and Greta Van Susteren. They've become quite palsy with everyone's favorite dominionist, Sarah Palin.

But Scientologists don't believe in Jesus, so how does that work?

LOL. A true believer must survive many trials and tests of faith before ascending to the innermost circle where the greatest secrets are revealed. Holy revelation will destroy any initiate not properly prepared to receive it.

But I will share a little secret with you, dear PalMD readers:

Travel a spiritual path to the holiest of holies at the center of any cult and you will encounter the exact same amazing revelation. The same. I kid you not. And once enlightened, you'll find that working with Masters outside your faith is no problemo.

Every member of the Council for National Policy has faced the holy of holies and learned the great secret.

Now, can you guess it for yourself?

Posted by: Anonymous | December 16, 2009 12:40 AM

10

Did you read the Wikipedia?

I'm curious to read Stephen Harper's "controversial" address to the group in 1997, if anyone can find a link.

If you were wondering why Mitt Romney's favorite book is some drek by L Ron Hubbard, well, know you know.

This group has alligned with the right but would switch sides faster than you can say, "Joe Leiberman" if that would further its utopian ambition.

Posted by: Anonymouse | December 16, 2009 12:52 AM

11

Dr Wonderful

Not wonderful, not a doctor.

Posted by: antipodean | December 16, 2009 4:12 PM

12

Dr.Wonderful
just because you don't seem to care much about Canadian legislation on the dangerous repercussions of ND prescribing on our health care doesn't mean no one does.

The National Post published 2 articles on the subject and were later posted online in their blog. The blog posts resulted in 120+ comments in a 24-hr period limit, averaging 1 comment every 5-15min. How's that for public interest? ;)

For those curious about those posts, here they are:
1)arguing against ND prescribing, Scott Garuva (RPh)
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/24/scott-gavura-naturopathy-a-prescription-for-quackery.aspx

2)arguing for, two NDs
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/27/counterpoint-no-magic-involved-in-naturopathic-medicine.aspx

This last post has great arguments against ND prescribing...good read for CAM skeptics.

Posted by: Avicenna | December 16, 2009 5:28 PM

13

Entertainingly, the CAND have pulled down that particular handout. Your link gets a 404 and if you search through the site, the same handout nets a blank document.

http://www.cand.ca/index.php?id=29&backPID=27&tt_news=66

Also entertainingly, they now have a link to the public health agency's website on flu.

I don't know if the negative attention was the kick they needed, but if so, let's keep on kicking.

Posted by: red rabbit | December 16, 2009 10:51 PM

14

well how bout that

Posted by: PalMD | December 16, 2009 10:57 PM

15

Here's the original document saved by a reader.

Posted by: PalMD | December 17, 2009 5:28 PM

16

Affiliate Marketing is a performance based sales technique used by companies to expand their reach into the internet at low costs. This commission based program allows affiliate marketers to place ads on their websites or other advertising efforts such as email distribution in exchange for payment of a small commission when a sale results.


www.onlineuniversalwork.com

Posted by: coetsee | February 2, 2010 4:39 AM

17

Work at home jobs can be hard to trust. That's why we research and publish only the best of the best... carefully pre-screened, 100% scam-free work at home jobs you can depend on. No get rich quick schemes. No scams. Just 100% real work at home jobs
www.onlineuniversalwork.com

Posted by: kiramatali shah | February 6, 2010 5:58 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.