2010 World Science Festival Blog

Yesterday, I went on Facebook. Not an unusual activity for someone my age. Or for someone my parents’ age, which I still haven’t gotten used to. But that’s not the point of this.

Several of my “friends” had statuses mentioning "Ophiuchus", whatever that is. One girl’s panicked reaction to this unpronounceable phenomenon had received enough attention to elicit ten of my peers to "comment" on it.

So, I did what any self-respecting person would do. I decided if nineteen-year-old girls were fascinated by it, it was probably just as important as Justin Beiber and Twilight.

But when I went on Twitter, I found that five of the last seven “tweets” the “tweeters” I follow had “tweeted” were about this “new zodiac sign” (the other two were about boobs and college basketball).

From what I can tell from my “friends” on social networking sites, the public understanding is that there is now a 13th zodiac sign called Ophiuchus in between Scorpio and Sagittarius. Many of my peers were quite upset about the new sign, including one Brooklyn-dwelling associate who was particularly miffed about the consequences for symbolism in Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow.

The most common rationalization of Ophiuchus’ existence was that the “new” zodiac doesn’t apply to people born before 2010 “because this new zodiac sign didnt exist before, since the equinox hadnt changed yet or whatever…” and “i havent noticed any radical planetary shift in my personality, so i refuse to recognize my sign as anything other than what i was born with.” If you can look past the internet teen’s lack of apostrophes or capitalization, you can see a desperate attempt to justify why the night sky isn’t any different than it was a week ago. However, there’s a much simpler answer.

It isn’t any different than it was a week ago.

Before yesterday, I was vaguely aware that the twelve constellations that comprise the zodiac were no longer the most prominent sign in the night sky during the dates they were commonly associated with. For example, I am a Cancer, but if I were to look in the night sky on my birthday, the most prominent constellation would be Gemini. Actually, if I were to look into the night sky on my birthday, I’d probably see the Moon, Venus, Polaris, Sirius, the Empire State Building, and not much else. But that’s because I live in Manhattan and beside the point.

While refreshing my knowledge of astronomy, it became evident that Ophiuchus is in the same place in the night sky it’s been for centuries. The IAU, the same guys who decided Pluto wasn’t a planet anymore, listed as one of their 88 official constellations back in the 1920s.

The Students for the Exploration and Development of Space website’s entry on the constellation contains the following passage:

“Although this constellation is not part of the zodiac the sun passes through Ophiuchus in December each year. When the zodiac first was invented by the Babylonians 3000 years ago, the sun just passes through the twelve constellations to which we still refer as the zodiac. Due to the precession of the Earth the apparent way of the sun through the sky has changed through the millenniums [sic].”

While this passage contains a bit too much scientific lingo, the basic idea is pretty clear. When the ancient Babylonians devised their zodiac, they thought the Earth was fixed at the center of an orb, and the heavens were painted on the inner surface. They divided the night sky into twelve equal sections, and labeled each section with a star picture they saw in it. Over the next 3000 years, humanity realized that the Earth itself moves with respect to the stars. Therefore, our perspective of the night sky slowly changes. The change is unnoticeable year to year, but over three millennia all those little changes add up. We’re seeing the heavens at a different angle than the ancient Babylonians, so their labels no longer make any sense. However, the labels stuck, and although they no longer have the same connection to astronomical fact, some people still use them to figure out if that office romance will ever work.

All that happened this week was that some guy from Minnesota— who is NOT a capital “P” Professor — informed The Star-Tribune and several other Twin Cities News outlets of this fact. Astronomy and Astrology are exactly the same as they were yesterday, and some guy from Minnesota’s attempt to confuse the entire internet by claiming everyone "has a new sign" is a disservice to both disciplines.

Astronomy is a scientific discipline concerned with accurately observing and cataloging phenomena in outer space. Astrology isn’t, it is a form of art. A 3000-year-old understanding of the stars works just fine for Astrology’s purposes. The inclusion of Ophiuchus in the Astrological Zodiac wouldn’t make it any more accurate, because Astrology hasn’t been based in objective reality for millennia.

Science journalism at it’s finest. Keep Calm and Carry On.

Michael J Kennelly is a Senior Physics Major at Columbia University, where he holds a I.I. Rabi Scholarship. He has completed research internships at Columbia, Rutgers University, The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratories, and The Large Hadron Collider at CERN. He hasn’t cared about anything happening in Minnesota since a 41-year-old man was found concussed on the state university’s football field last month.

Image courtesy of Amadeus Varadi Hellequin

 

Comments

  1. #1 jh kennelly
    January 14, 2011

    Over the next 3000 years, humanity realized that the Earth itself moves with respect to the stars. hey, Christmas just ended. How many more myths will science bust?

  2. #2 Greg Laden
    January 15, 2011

    It would be really really funny if they came up with an astronomically accurate zodiac and horoscope system and it ended up working very nicely.

  3. #3 Wow
    February 15, 2011

    Not really, Greg. Punishing the criminal would be morally indefensible since the stars made them do it and we all become automatons, working our inevitable doom to pointlessness.

    And xians think that atheists are nihilistic…

  4. #4 realscienceexperience
    May 12, 2011

    Hello, this is a great blog! :)

    Here is another great blog for you to enjoy: realscienceexperience.wordpress.com

    The Real Science Experience is a blog written by university students who have come from various backgrounds (and countries) and have followed the Bachelor of Science down different pathways from undergraduates to masters. On this blog we discuss what it is really like to study science at a tertiary level.

  5. #5 supratall
    May 26, 2011

    OK, I’ll come clean: this reminds me of an embarrassingly recent conversation with my materials science-trained boyfriend.

  6. #6 dmabs
    May 29, 2011

    Sunday Sacrilege pz’s blaspheming head

    debunkingskeptics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1756

  7. #7 oosaravelli movie stills
    October 1, 2011

    thanks for the confirmation. I worried so much about this with dilemma.

  8. #8 Sam
    October 2, 2011

    Judging by how quick those girls were to believe that there was a new Zodiac shows how people will believe almost anything they hear these days. I bet that those girls didn’t think to do any research or even Google the subject to prove that it was true. There is so much information out there about the littlest thing that we don’t even think twice about. Many people just look at the horoscope as just a plan for their day without thinking of where it comes from. People just look at the prediction and don’t wonder where that knowledge even comes from.

  9. #9 Nataliel
    October 6, 2011

    The funny thing is that after this information was published in newspapers, the astrology sections didn’t change. This just shows that society always has to cover up their mistakes, because they know people will forget. Though we are only talking about unimportant astrology signs, it just goes to show that this theme follows society everywhere.

  10. #10 osmanlı iksiri
    October 12, 2011

    Not really, Greg. Punishing the criminal would be morally indefensible since the stars made them do it and we all become automatons, working our inevitable doom to pointlessness.

  11. #11 seo services
    January 12, 2012

    If you have got a bilingual website, which includes various filling, the seo backlinks service will do great work for it!

  12. #12 jason
    February 18, 2012

    simple :)

  13. #13 afrika mangosu
    March 5, 2012

    Though we are only talking about unimportant astrology signs, it just goes to show that this theme follows society everywhere.

  14. #14 Matt Dew
    March 24, 2012

    Now I can stop worrying. Thanks for the update.

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!