Official Comment Count: 1,031,310

The World's Fair

All manner of human creativity on display

Search this blog

Profile

profile.gif David Ng is Director of the Advanced Molecular Biology Laboratory at the University of British Columbia - this is a just a fancier way of calling himself a science teacher.

profile.gifBenjamin Cohen is an Asst. Professor of Science, Tech., and Society at the University of Virginia. He studies the place of S & T in environmental history, policy, and ethics. He also writes other stuff.

mappsmall.gifTrying to find your way around this place? Like most expositions, we offer a map: Map of The World's Fair





Need a car? Of course you do. Try this one:
Car%20for%20Sale%20sm.jpg




"The world is full of light and life, and the true crime is not to be interested in it." A.S. Byatt

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Links

Blogroll

And so forth...

« Things to get excited about: ASIC 200 - an Arts and Science Intergrated Course on global issues | Main | The Toxic Behavior of Our Sponsor: Dow's Social and Environmental Catastrophes In Sight »

Hot dog science.

Category: Nature, as in parts, bits, molecular and stuff
Posted on: July 4, 2007 11:26 AM, by David Ng

snackframes.jpg

Today sees the reprinting of a classic textbook piece at the Science Creative Quarterly. It's actually a rebuttal written by a friend to an earlier piece, but basically does an awesome job discussing the various characteristics of fat (particularly as it relates to the hot dog). Here's how the rebuttal begins:

"Although your scientific curiosity is to be applauded, your experimental methodology seems exceedingly limited, and lacks many important details. Your report describes only a single experiment, with no repetition or statistical analysis, and no meaningful description of the nature of the sample (beef or pork? smoked or unsmoked? jumbo or regular?). Similarly, your description and discussion of results is purely qualitative and exceedingly terse. What mass of fluid was extracted from the hot dog? What was the initial mass and volume of the sample? The fluid is characterized solely as "fat", but no analytical details are provided to support this conclusion. Your characterization of the final product as "literally, a stick" was met with particular disbelief from one reviewer, who points out that a microwave-induced transformation of protein to cellulose would defy all known laws of chemical and biochemical reaction. Finally, your conclusion seems to be little more than "hot dogs have a lot of fat in them", a conclusion of little or no scientific merit in that it would be immediately apparent to any numbskull who reads a nutrition label.

"In conclusion, we feel that your experimental design and implementation would rank well below par at any high school science fair, and recommend that for your next project, you try building a trebuchet. Because trebuchets are freaking cool."

To read more (and learn a few things along the way), click here.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Dignity denied 10.10.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. This poll cannot stand 10.10.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. The Worldnutdaily's Latest Faux Outrage 10.10.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. MRFF Reveals Anti-Semitic Assault at Ft. Benning 10.10.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. He's Got a Point 10.09.2008 · Ed Brayton

Search All Blogs