Seed Media Group

The World's Fair

All manner of human creativity on display

Search this blog

Profile

profile.gif David Ng is Director of the Advanced Molecular Biology Laboratory at the University of British Columbia - this is a just a fancier way of calling himself a science teacher.

profile.gifBenjamin Cohen is an Asst. Professor of Science, Tech., and Society at the University of Virginia. He studies the place of S & T in environmental history, policy, and ethics. He also writes other stuff.

mappsmall.gifTrying to find your way around this place? Like most expositions, we offer a map: Map of The World's Fair


Need a car? Of course you do. Try this one:

Car%20for%20Sale%20sm.jpg




Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Links

Blogroll

And so forth...

« Glitter, Martha Stewart, Easter Pie, Darfur and Bill Clinton: Now there's a list you don't see very often... | Main | Magnetic Appeal: MRI and the Myth of Transparency: medical knowledge, healthcare policy, and those huge loud machines, with author Kelly Joyce »

Timebomb - everybody dance.

Category: The Art/Science (Non?)Divide Building
Posted on: March 28, 2008 1:39 PM, by David Ng

Boy, talk about consumption. Great music video featuring the digital art prowess of Chris Jordan.


We offer this as a follow-up to last summer's "What We Waste," a post on Jordan's work that was part of a larger discussion of consumption patterns and energy (cf. E-trash , What We Eat, and this larger conversation on e-trash with Lizzie Grossman).

Comments

I lost nearly all respect for Beck after I learned he was a Scientologist.

Posted by: cephyn | March 28, 2008 5:21 PM

"I lost nearly all respect for Beck..."

Okay. Duly noted. Any thoughts about the visual message in the video?

 

Posted by: etbnc | March 28, 2008 5:30 PM

Sure. Impressive but ultimately worthless. People are overwhelmed by numbers like that - they just turn numb and forget about it. Eddie Izzard has a bit about this and mass murderers - after a certain number, we just can't comprehend it anymore. It's all the same.

So yeah, we produce a ton of waste. But with SO MUCH being produced, how can little ol' me even make a dent? It's just not worth it. That's what people think.

There are only 2 ways to get people to do something, en masse - 1) pay them and/or 2) make it easy. Municipal recycling programs are very successful, usage-wise. But if there isn't any, not so much. The only things that do OK are things you get paid for. But grocery bag recycling? Forget it - you don't get paid, and you have to haul the bags back to the store (at best) to recycle them. Hell I have a huge pile of grocery bags. I feel guilty tossing them - but like I'm gonna pile 1000 bags into my car and go to the store with them? But give me a bin in my backyard, and I'm more than happy to participate.

Posted by: cephyn | March 28, 2008 6:51 PM

please assure me you were being facetious cephyn. your solution to a specious morality of unblinkered self-interest and laziness is to cater to the whims of the self-interested and lazy?

Posted by: brc | March 30, 2008 5:31 PM

Perhaps cephyn is no longer available.

Although sentiments like cephyn's tend to frustrate and depress me, I do see an element of interest to me underlying those comments. Currently our culture does have socially-reinforced belief mechanisms that tend to make harmful behaviors our default. Those socially-reinforced beliefs sometimes create some extra work just to Do The Right Thing. And that does pretty much suck.

I recall that BRC once said something along the lines of, "All scholarship is about making things VISIBLE." I like that. It describes my experience.

I didn't understand this stuff, and I didn't really pay attention, until I had the experience of someone directing my gaze, holding my attention, and saying the equivalent of, "Don't look away. Keep looking until you SEE."

And after I finally noticed the stuff that I had not been paying attention to, I discovered that I could no longer ignore it.

Different people have different ways of noticing things, I guess. I'd like to think that pairing the waste message with popular music (popular with some listeners, at least) might hold someone's attention long enough for them to notice what it means. Or at least to begin to become somewhat more willing to consider paying a little more attention, next time.

 

Posted by: etbnc | March 31, 2008 4:03 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com