Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

The World's Fair

All manner of human creativity on display

Search

Profile

haeckel.gif

- David Ng is Director of the AMBL at the University of British Columbia - fancy speak for a science teacher. Follow Dave on twitter @dnghub.

WindowA.jpg

- Vince LiCata is a faculty member in Biological Sciences and Chemistry at Louisiana State University (LSU). His laboratory studies protein-ligand interactions, protein folding, and biothermodynamics. He also writes plays that have been produced in a number of different US cities, and, oddly enough, in Thailand.

peale.gif

- Benjamin Cohen was a co-founder and is now Blogger Laureate at The World's Fair. He teaches at the University of Virginia and is the author of Notes from the Ground: Science, Soil and Society in the American Countryside (Yale, 2009). Now you can find him at brcohen.net.
notesfromground.jpg

taste.gif
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8


Recent Posts

And so forth...

- Subscribe to the World's Fair
- Send me emails!

cannonball.gif
Cannonball Series


authorblogger.gif
Author-Blogger Series


Tt.gif
STUDENTS ROCK!


"The world is full of light and life, and the true crime is not to be interested in it." A.S. Byatt

PF.gif
Puzzle Fantastica 1 | 2 | 3


batman.gif
Batman as scientist


showdown.gif
SCIENCE SHOWDOWN!


geekmusic.gif
Science songs 1 | 2

Recent Comments

Links


sciencescoutsbadge.gif

Into science and badges? Then check out the Science Scouts. Go ahead - join the facebook group, or follow the twitter feed.


boingboing.gif
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6


039a6a6632927c2b1869363d8ba3f4e9.gif
(Banner image by Tsethe)


Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences



View blog authority


Blogroll

Archives

« Where exactly does food come from? I fear this artist's take on it might be all too real for many these days. | Main | "The Danish Text." Oh dear - this might hurt a little. Copenhagen soap opera continues... »

A video that is a good antidote to all of this climate change conspiracy nonsense. Worth a look.

Category: Ethics Palace: Where ethical questions go to live or dieNatureLand: What They Used to Call the EnvironmentVideo links (archive.org samples, for example; Youtube.com; others...)
Posted on: December 7, 2009 4:20 PM, by David Ng



(hattip to Nick at terry.ubc.ca)
Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/126623

Comments

1

The problem with the trick to hide the decline is that you can't separate the two.

Another meaning of trick apart from being clever is something designed to deceive.

How do you tell which is the meaning? You look at the word hide. Hiding something? Is that being clever or being deceiptful? It's being deceiptful.

Now, why is the last 50 years important and why should you switch from proxy to real? It's not the important point.

The critical point is that if the proxies do not show the recorded temperature, you can conclude one of two things.

1. The recorded temperatures are wrong.
2. The proxies don't work and show actual temperatures.

Take your pick

Nick

Posted by: Nick | December 7, 2009 6:17 PM

2

False dichotomy. You can also conclude that 3. The proxies don't work now due to recent anthropogenic, non-climatic influences, but work in the past when those influences were absent.

Posted by: Ambitwistor | December 7, 2009 7:37 PM

3

Not at all.

You have to assume that GW exists, in order to justify removing the proxies, in order to show that GW exists.

It's completely circular argument.

You can't haul yourself up by your own bootstraps.

Posted by: Nick | December 8, 2009 6:58 AM

4

No, Nick.

Look, it's actually very simple.

We started getting actual instrumental records over 150 years ago.

We have proxies for that period and for earlier periods.

For 110 of those 150 years, the proxies and the instrumental records matched up well. Then, the tree ring proxies fell away and the instrumental records indicated real rises.

What this indicates is that for most of that time, the tree ring proxies are good indicators of real temperatures, but in the 1960s something happened to make them not good indicators -- could well have been impact by other types of pollution.

We KNOW that the temperature rise is real, and we know that the proxies USED to be good indicators for temperature but aren't any more. This isn't conspiracy, it is trying to be sane about data. And we need assume nothing.

Posted by: Luna_the_cat | December 8, 2009 7:48 AM

5

If I had a boiling pan I'd know it was about water's boiling temperature.

But apparently if the pan got so a hole melted in it and all the water fell out or evaporated, it would be circular logic to suggest the pan is getting hotter?

My analogy is terrible, but I like it, so there.

Posted by: Lucas McCarty | December 8, 2009 2:39 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.