Erotic Falconry is disturbingly, wonderfully, real (we think... hope?). Their mission statement as stated on EroticFalconry.com: "Our goal is to show others what turns us on so that they can see the natural sexual ferocity of our feathered friends."
EroticFalconry knows they may not be accepted by us mainstream squares. Just see things their way... "Where's the perversion in loving another one of God's creatures? Where's the deviance in wanting to pull feathers rather than blond hair?" Their defense then proceeds to get exponentially more graphic...
Click "Read on" for Pg-13 shots depicting sexually suggestive themes and the naughtiest young falcons preening just for you...
Check out the actual site here. Be warned, it contains much more explicit but utterly ridiculous material. Many thanks to Dom Rioux for sharing this...
Humanities & Social Science
Brain & Behavior
Comments
And I thought the "Falconer" sketch on SNL was just a joke...
Posted by: Laelaps | February 29, 2008 2:42 PM
Finally, all my dreams have come true!
Posted by: pough | February 29, 2008 2:57 PM
Wow, those are some disturbingly high production values for niche fetish art.
Posted by: Maria | February 29, 2008 3:01 PM
You guys are so hilarious. :) Always something utterly entertaining on your website. It's hard for me to choose my favorite one. Two I like most are the "falcon in Speedo" and "Falcon-Bum".
Pat
Posted by: Pat K. | February 29, 2008 3:06 PM
"Wow, those are some disturbingly high production values for niche fetish art."
Yes indeed.
Posted by: Andrew | February 29, 2008 3:37 PM
High production values are easier to obtain when all you're doing is photoshopping existing artwork.
As for the statement "Erotic Falconry is disturbingly, wonderfully, real", it appears only to be true for very small values of "real."
Posted by: Evan | February 29, 2008 4:02 PM
oh ye of little faith...
Posted by: Andrew | February 29, 2008 4:06 PM
What. My brain just seized up.
Posted by: Naim | February 29, 2008 4:53 PM
xkcd comic didn't predict this exactly, only the general principle.
Posted by: derek | February 29, 2008 4:58 PM
where but on zooillogix would such fowl deeds be uncovered?
Posted by: Mark Powell | February 29, 2008 6:07 PM
Wow, I wonder how many people are really into this?
I have trouble making the leap to 'erotic and exciting' from 'has talons that can reduce my face to Spaghetti-O's'
I guess that's the thrill? The possibility of being horribly maimed? Are people fetishizing threshers, too? 'Hotdeadlyfarmingequipment.net?'
I'm really trying to understand this. Perhaps a bit too hard.
Posted by: Jenbug | March 1, 2008 9:08 AM
In Flemish, 'vogelen' (literally: 'birding') means having sexual intercourse. This peculiar semantic relation has been the subject of many thorough psycholinguistic studies.
At last, problem solved. Thank you, Mr. Tittingfield!
Did they have ottomans in Emmerson's time?
Posted by: LonelyFatGuy | March 1, 2008 11:35 AM
Wow, those are some disturbingly high production values for niche fetish art.
I was at the photoshoot that the photo of the dom flogging the bent over boy was made at and can attest to the fact that there was no faclon there. getting high quality images off the internet and using photoshop to play with them is pretty easy. and hysterically funny.
and jenbug, there is a dungeon group in the seattle area that does a lot of work with farm equipment and bdsm/torture devices. i was trying to find their website, but couldn't. sorry.
if you can think it up, there is a fetish for it out there.
Posted by: not me | March 1, 2008 2:44 PM
"not me" sounds like you have some good stories to tell!
I do think it might be sexier if they improve their photoshop skills just a little more. Ummm... well not really, but it was worth the laugh.
Posted by: nurblvr | March 2, 2008 12:14 AM
yikes
Posted by: ym | March 3, 2008 5:42 PM
Yeah, I was wondering why the bent-over boy in the flogging pic was wearing a strap-on harness and a falcon. It just seemed a little over the top (no pun intended).
Posted by: Tlazolteotl | March 6, 2008 4:39 PM
I don't know what's worse.. the fact that this site exists or the realization that I'm mildly disappointed it's all photoshopped.
Posted by: Anonymous | March 22, 2008 3:22 PM