(If this doesn't work for you in Chrome, try IE or something)
Zooillogix
Don't Stick Your Fingers in the Cage
Video of the Week
Kunekune Pigs
Bleiman Brothers Profile

In the wild, Andrew feeds on fish, sponges, small crustaceans, nematode worms and protozoans.

Benny's diet is very specialized, consisting mainly of the interior of Ramy nuts, nectar from the Traveller's Palm tree, some fungi and insect grubs. He is also known to raid coconut plantations, and has been seen eating lychees and mangoes, which are also plantation crops.
Search
Recent Posts
- Julia + Hawaii + Your Friends = Good Times + Great Oldies
- Turtles Are Not Pure Evil
- Zombies schmombies. Let's talk parasites.
- So, you think you're smart?
- Hot Molting Action
- Spectacular Deep Sea Squid Footage
- Meth Snails Feel the Need... the Need Not to Extend Their Breathing Tubes Lest They Get Poked
- Time-lapse photography is the best!
- Life cycle / Cycle of life
- Death by Ass Eel (not) Debunked
Recent Comments
- greivin muñoz arce on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
- greivin muñoz arce on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
- سعودي كول 6666 on Monster Toad Captured!
- İnsan Kaynakları on Thousands of New Species Discovered on Tiny Island
- سعودي انحراف on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
- سعودي انحراف on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
- سعودي انحراف on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
- Tomas on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
- folklore on Hookworms Are Nature's Claritin
- Angel on Winter (the Dolphin) Swims with Prosthetic Flipper
Archives
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blogroll
Look How Important We Are
View blog authority
Read the super-informative Interview with the Bleiman Brothers
World's Largest Zoo and Shot Glass Collection
Now accepting donations in exchange for recognition and fame on Zooillogix!
Currently Featured: Seattle Aquarium from Jason Brunet of JeffTheFish.com - the official website of baby rats!
The List:
Adventure Aquarium
Aquarium of the Bay
Baton Rouge Zoo
Birch Aquarium at Scripps
Bronx Zoo
Brookfield Zoo
Cincinnati Zoo
Cleveland Metroparks Zoo
Florida Aquarium
Georgia Aquarium
Honolulu Zoo
Houston Aquarium
Knoxville Zoo
Lincoln Park Zoo
Los Angeles Zoo
Louisville Zoo
Maritime Center in Norwalk, CT
Milwaukee Zoo
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Mystic Aquarium
National Aquarium
New England Aquarium
New York Aquarium
Newport Aquarium
North Carolina Aquarium
North Carolina Zoological Society
Oakland Zoo
Oregon Coast Aquarium
Philadelphia Zoo
Pittsburgh Zoo
Rio Grande Zoo
Ripley's Aquarium of the Smokies
San Antonio Zoo
San Diego Zoo
San Francisco Zoo
Santa Barbara Zoo
Sea World San Diego
Seattle Aquarium
Shedd Aquarium
Smithsonian National Zoo
South Carolina Aquarium
Tennessee Aquarium
Two Oceans Aquarium, Cape Town, SA
Vancouver Aquarium
Feed me Seymour!
« Of Moles and Men (and worms) | Main | Zooillogix Gives Birth »
Dog Emits Radio from Ears, CNN Offers No Explanation
Category: chihuahua
Posted on: October 15, 2008 5:38 PM, by Benny Bleiman
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/83542


Comments
I don't understand why they refer to this as a "radio signal." Radio signals are electromagnetic waves, not sound waves.
Posted by: Davis | October 15, 2008 6:42 PM
Radio? No, audio.
Posted by: Harrumph | October 15, 2008 7:02 PM
I remember learning about this in humans in my undergrad psych course on perception...
Here's something related: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE1DB1E3AF93AA35755C0A964958260&sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=all
Posted by: Eric | October 15, 2008 7:21 PM
It's simple, this is how he sends data back to his home world. He's obviously an alien, I mean just look at him.
Posted by: tguy | October 15, 2008 7:52 PM
Aw, chihuahuas are all robots anyway. It's no wonder one goes on the fritz ever now and then.
Posted by: Jenbug | October 16, 2008 12:03 AM
That's some wicked loud tinnitus!
Posted by: s1mplex | October 16, 2008 12:56 PM
Great link, Eric! I had no idea that ears can produce sounds.
And curse you, s1mplex, for beating me to the punch(line).
Posted by: Sheri | October 16, 2008 7:30 PM
The most logical reason is because the dog contains a chip. The chip in which many dogs are being implanted with is a RFID or Radio Frequency Identification type chip.
These chips not only can track or locate a dog with a special tracking number but they also record and EMIT RADIO frequency, thus the reason for the sound.
These chips are usually passive, and powered by the living oranism but are read by special scanners. Most implanted dog chips are at the 125mhz or 134 mhz frequency however there are some at 13.56 too. They can be made and programmed to any frequency, as this is a Nanotechnology enhanced device.
The poor dog must have damage to his sensitive ear from having to live with this.
Posted by: Susan Hutson | October 20, 2008 11:53 AM
As noted in the comments of my blog, I don't agree with Ms. Hutson. The RFID chips in dogs are passive. They need a scanner or other device to provide induction for the coil.
It's only conjecture, but I think that his bulla (inner ear) may work as a Helmholtz resonator.
http://smartdogs.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/radio-chihuahua-explained/
Posted by: Janeen | October 22, 2008 4:59 PM
The chip can only be read from a reader. As long as the dog is alive the chip will emit radio frequency, hence the name Radio Frequency Identification. The living dog actually powers the chip within, which is what the Verichip company origninally informed the public of, until they changed their marketing tactics a few years ago.
If the dog's ear is working as a Helmhotz resinator, why don't all or many of the Chihuahua's ears do this?
I say, put your money where your mouth is and let's prove it either way!
The dog resides 20 miles from me and I would be willing, if the dog owner was agreeable, to checking this out further.
What would it take to make you understand?
Posted by: S Hutson | October 23, 2008 5:36 PM
They can be made and programmed to any frequency, as this is a Nanotechnology enhanced device.
Posted by: zayıflama | October 27, 2008 5:04 PM
Susan, I respect and appreciate the act of throwing down that gauntlet, but will pass on your challenge. In googling you up I see that you already have a horse in this race (i.e. found web articles by you arguing against microchip implants) so I'd just as soon put my energy to other efforts.
If you find the answer and document it, let me know.
As for me, I see that all chips are made the same so believe that in the same environment they should all make dogs' ears resonate like the Chihuahua's. And they don't. But... each dog's ear is unique in many ways so Eric may be right or I may be (or neither)... but I still don't think it's the chips.
Posted by: Smartdogs | October 28, 2008 12:16 AM