Project

Weekend Diversion: The Andromeda Project

esiegel — Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:06:14 +0000

Weekend Diversion: The Andromeda Project

"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little." -George Carlin

Whatever you may think of the chances are for intelligent life in our galaxy are today, I can guarantee you they're going to go up dramatically in a few billion years. Sure, by that time the Earth may be a little too hot for comfort, and in that sense -- as Split Lip Rayfield would say -- we'll probably

Never Make It Home.

But that doesn't mean there won't be a new-and-improved home out there, not only from among the stars and planets in our own galaxy, but from the ones in our closer, larger neighbor, Andromeda!

Image credit: Christopher Madson, user mads0100 of astrobin, via http://www.astrobin.com/54638/.

Over the next few billion years, our galactic big sister will continue to approach us, eventually merging with us and combining into -- most probably -- a giant elliptical galaxy.

Image credit: NASA; ESA; A. Feild and R. van der Marel (STScI), T. Hallas, and A. Mellinger.

What's remarkable about this is that by time this merger takes place in the far future, a star-and-planet born today in Andromeda will have the potential to be Earth-like by then! So when we look at the young star clusters there today, these could be the future homes of civilizations like our own, or potentially colonizable and inhabitable worlds for human-like creatures.

And just like we have star clusters in our own galaxy (and background galaxies behind our galaxy's stars), so does Andromeda. In the outer reaches of Andromeda (as seen in stunning resolution in the Hubble image, below), you can easily pick out background galaxies and star clusters.

Image credit: NASA, ESA and T.M. Brown (STScI) / Hubble Space Telescope.

But what about in the inner reaches of Andromeda?

It turns out the data is there, but it's far too massive an undertaking for a team of scientists, and yet far too difficult an undertaking for artificial intelligence. After all, this is how much of Andromeda has been imaged by Hubble:

Image credit: Robert Gendler via the Andromeda Project blog, http://blog.andromedaproject.org/.

And this is what a tiny, tiny fraction of the Andromeda galaxy is encapsulated by a single Hubble image. Note the two prominent open star clusters in there.

Image credit: Robert Gendler & Zolt Levay.

So that's the level-of-detail necessary to identify star clusters in our nearest-neighbor galaxy.

Well, it might be too big a task for a few dozen scientists and too smart of a task for a machine, but that's what citizen science is all about, and so I'm pleased to introduce you to The Andromeda Project!

Image credit: Robert Gendler (of Andromeda); screenshot from http://www.andromedaproject.org/.

You can sign up and log in, or simply start classifying objects! When you begin, you'll be presented with a tutorial, but I'd like to prep you anyway.

Here's what you're looking for.

Image credit: screenshot from the Andromeda Project.

First off, the most common actual thing you'll find are star clusters, which can be blue, white or orange in these images, and can be bright and prominent or dim and faint, barely visible against the other stars in the plane of Andromeda.

There are also background galaxies, which is always a treat for me when one shows up!

Image credit: screenshot from the Andromeda Project.

These are often faint, diffuse and orange, and unlike star clusters cannot be resolved into individual points-of-light.

And finally, there are artifacts that contaminate the images. While cosmic rays (blue or orange streaky lines) and edge-of-field effects aren't things that you should mark, diffraction spikes (from foreground, Milky Way stars) and the rarer satellite trails and ghost images (which I haven't seen any of, yet) are important to identify.

Image credit: screenshot from the Andromeda Project.

And while there are some images that won't have anything of interest at all, most of them have at least one interesting thing. Don't be discouraged if you aren't sure how to mark something; I'm absolutely positive that's a difficulty we all share!

Here, have a look at an image I came across, and see what you would've done?

Image credit: screenshot -- before and after -- from The Andromeda Project.

I said there were three galaxies and one star cluster, although I'm not sure even now whether that's correct.

Sometimes, when you find a star cluster, you'll get a message like this:

Image credit: The Andromeda Project.

A synthetic cluster? Believe it or not, this is brilliant! The team inserted fake star clusters of varying colors and brightnesses to make a control to see how good people are at identifying clusters. of different properties. When you find a synthetic cluster, it's surefire confirmation that you're finding something you're supposed to find!

But don't stop at just one; sometimes synthetic cluster and real clusters can show up alongside one another.

Image credit: screenshot -- before and after -- from The Andromeda Project.

Did I miss a small one just to the right-of-center in the image above? Maybe, and that's okay. Don't worry if you get something wrong; plenty of people do and that's taken into account!

The key is that there are many, many eyes on each of these images, and on average we're good at getting it right. This is actually phase II of the Andromeda Project, and results from phase I can give you some indication of how the general public is doing. Check it out!

Thanks to Julianne Dalcanton for her initiative in this (the project is known as the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury) and for bringing it onto my radar. If you'd like to participate -- it's free, easy and fun -- head on over to the Andromeda Project site (http://www.andromedaproject.org/) and start classifying our future neighbors right now!

esiegel Sat, 10/26/2013 - 07:06

Tags

Astronomy

Random Stuff

Andromeda

Citizen science

galaxy zoo

Project

zooniverse

Great idea and article here, stunning images. Cheers. :-)

I have participated in this and it is highly interesting for several reasons. First - I enjoy perusing the images. And second- it is precisely the same process that I use in my own professional work. I am a radiologist and my day is spent searching for abnormalities on various types of images - usually breasts - mammograms, ultrasounds, and MR scans. I want to point out that anyone who participates in the andromeda project will experience the internal dialog ('is that REALLY something? Should I mark it?) that we radiologists go through thousands of times a day. The anxiety about false negatives and false positives is always there. In this way, non-radiologists can get an idea of how difficult image interpretation actually is, vs the way it is usually discussed among lay people ("my mammogram was negative" - implying a 100% certainty).The andromeda project is something that the informed lay person can participate in without the years of training we go through.
I would be interested to know what they might have tried in the way of computer recognition. In our neck of the woods, it is called Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), and is used nearly universally for mammograms, and is starting to be used for some CT scans. It will mark areas of some suspicion for further analysis by the radiologist, in this way hopefully avoiding some false negatives. It will mark on average between 3-7 places on each case (you can set the sensitivity), so that in a thousand cases, you will have 3000 - 7000 marks to wade through, and among these will be about 4 cancers.

a couple of other things.
You can read more about the results of the initial part of the project here:
http://blog.andromedaproject.org
and see the poster that was presented at the AAS here:
http://www.astro.washington.edu/users/lcjohnso/andromedaproj_aas2013.pdf

They note that the project was completed in a month, with "citizen scientists" viewing more than 1,000,000,000 images in that time.

I've read that the collision or intersection of two galaxies can produce gravitational interactions between stars that can fling a star out of a galaxy entirely. If this is correct, what range of speeds would be expected for stars that are ejected by galaxies in this way, relative to the movement of the galaxy from which they were ejected?

Hopefully by the time that Andromeda and the Milky Way collide, we or post-we are spread out across numerous star systems, with the technology to do interstellar trips at a low two-digit percentage of c.

By that time, we will have found numerous other planets with indigenous life on them, and probably at least one other technologically-capable civilization. We will have a pretty good idea of the range of life that exists in the Milky Way. But we won't, until that point, have had any way to explore star systems in other galaxies.

The question is, does life work the same way in other galaxies as in our own? The collision with Andromeda will give us the chance to find out, by tracking incoming stars and then searching for life-bearing planets around them. Missions sent to those systems would find the biological data to answer this question.

These types of projects would take thousands, possibly tens of thousands of years, even for an advanced civilization. But if we've passed the cosmic Darwin test of interstellar migration, we'll have the long span ahead of us to explore and discover on many fronts that appear unimaginable today.

I join to the project with USM www.kanevuniverse.com

Fantastic article, great work bringing attention to citizen science.

And thanks for featuring my Andromeda image Ethan!

- Adam
www.flickr.com/astroporn
www.sky-candy.ca

The Evolution of Life in 60 Seconds

cevans — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:00:00 +0000

The Evolution of Life in 60 Seconds

The Evolution of Life in 60 Seconds is an experiment in scale: by condensing 4.6 billion years of history into a minute, the video serves as a self-contained timepiece. Like a specialized clock, it gives a sense of perspective. Every eventâ--âfrom the formation of the Earth, to the Cambrian Explosion, to the evolution of mice and squirrelsâ--âis proportionate to every other, displaying humankind as a blip, almost indiscernible in the layered course of history. This is useful, largely, for the sake of humility.

Each event in the Evolution of Life fades gradually over the course of the minute, leaving typographic traces that echo all the way to the present day, just as our blood still bears the salty tang of our most ancient evolutionary ancestors.

This video was commissioned by SEED Magazine for its Darwin Day 2009 celebration, and was screened at the 2009 Brooklyn International Film Festival.

cevans Thu, 02/25/2010 - 12:00

Tags

Evolution of Life in 60 Seconds

OK, liked the video. But again, we only know what our level of technology allows us to know.
The continental masses are scraped clean, excepting that fragment in Canada and Aussie land. So, here on Ratland, where it is hot, flat and crowded, the only thing we can tell is that the sky has a lesser proportion of life that the hot, flat, crowded part. Bats are as old as Lake Titicaca. 2 million. We aren't quite sure about the H2O part as we have yet to id all the stuff there.

absolutely mindblowing that all the prehistoric and historic events are only a blink of the eye compared to dear old earth's other activities. Our anthropocentric myopism is most evident the stories of our religious texts and popular culture. we need more geocentric or earth centered stories for ourselves and our children or else there may soon be no more storytellers.

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

2 Now the earth was [a] formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light "day," and the darkness he called "night." And there was evening, and there was morningâthe first day.

6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morningâthe second day.

9 And God said, "Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear." And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground "land," and the gathered waters he called "seas." And God saw that it was good.

11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds." And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morningâthe third day.

14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth." And it was so. 16 God made two great lightsâthe greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morningâthe fourth day.

20 And God said, "Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the sky." 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth." 23 And there was evening, and there was morningâthe fifth day.

24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.

26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, [b] and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.

28 God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground."

29 Then God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air and all the creatures that move on the groundâeverything that has the breath of life in itâI give every green plant for food." And it was so.

31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morningâthe sixth day

What is this, Pharyngula?

SURVIVAL OF THE WITLESS
-- James Ph. Kotsybar

When fire, water, earth and air were thought
to be the elementals that composed
all matter, folks did not remain distraught
at what avant-garde chemists then proposed.
Most understand that our world is a sphere,
with only one natural satellite.
No matter where folks sail, they do not fear
theyâll reach Earthâs edge and fall into the night.
Most even have embraced that timeâs not fixed
and have adopted relativity.
So why should folksâ beliefs remain so mixed
about evolutionâs activity?
Abundant evidence supports this view,
yet institutions argue itâs not true.

Genesis Teaser Trailer is Up!

esiegel — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:05:12 +0000

Genesis Teaser Trailer is Up!

What is the future of this website? I'm going to be creating videos for the web about the Universe. I'll be answering questions ranging from what the Universe is like today to how it got to be that way. I'm going to address every step that we know of, from the Big Bang up to the present day.

And I'm going to do it naturally, by telling the story as the Universe tells it directly to us. I call this project Genesis. Check out the teaser trailer below, and tell your friends, because this is coming in January.

esiegel Thu, 04/17/2008 - 20:05