electronic cigarettes

E-cigarettes emit a range of harmful chemicals, some known human carcinogens

kkrisberg — Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:00:08 +0000

E-cigarettes emit a range of harmful chemicals, some known human carcinogens

The verdict on whether electronic cigarettes are safer than traditional cigarettes is still very much out. However, a recent study found e-cigarette emissions contain a variety of concerning chemicals, including some considered to be probable carcinogens.

In a study published in July in Environmental Science & Technology, researchers found significant levels of 31 harmful chemical compounds in e-cigarette vapors, including two that had yet to be detected: propylene oxide and glycidol, both of which health researchers have described as reasonably anticipated to be human carcinogens. Researchers also found chemical emission differences based on the voltage of the e-cig vaporizer and how many puffs users take. Those differences are a particularly interesting takeaway because they touch on ways that manufacturers, or even users, may be able to minimize potentially harmful exposures.

However, study co-author Hugo Destaillats, a staff scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and deputy leader of its Indoor Environment Group, stressed that while the study’s findings are concerning, they are not a definitive statement as to whether e-cigarettes are less, just as or more harmful to human health than regular cigarettes.

“I don’t want to be seen as scaremongering,” Destaillats told me. “It may be that (e-cigarettes) are better than traditional cigarettes, especially for people who want to quit (cigarettes) but can’t. …But there are decades of research on smoking and little on vaping, so I wouldn’t be surprised if people find health effects we didn’t consider.”

To conduct the study, researchers simulated vaping using three different e-liquids (the substances heated to produce vapor) and two different vaporizers, and then used a method known as gas and liquid chromatography to determine the contents of the e-cigarette emissions. They found several volatile ingredients in the e-liquids, including two solvents (propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin), nicotine, propylene oxide, ethanol and acetol. When the two solvents, which the study noted are found in most e-liquids, were heated and began to decompose, it led to emissions of acrolein, a known irritant, and formaldehyde, a known human carcinogen. Researchers also said that propylene oxide, a likely impurity of propylene glycol, is probably present in most e-liquids now on the market, which is concerning because propylene oxide is also considered a probable carcinogen as well as a known respiratory and eye irritant.

The study also found big differences in the emissions produced by the first and last puffs. To imitate how people use e-cigarettes in real life, researchers used an apparatus that took puffs lasting five seconds every 30 seconds. Emissions were significantly higher once the vaporizers reached a steady temperature (what researchers called “steady-state”) at around 20 puffs, as compared to the first five to 10 minutes of puffing when the temperature was still rising. In fact, researchers found that in some cases, emission levels increased by a factor of 10 or more between initial puffs and steady-state puffs. For example, levels of the eye and respiratory irritant acrolein went from 0.46 micrograms to 8.7 micrograms per puff between initial temperature and steady-state temperature.

“When we look at the chemical composition in the first couple puffs versus the final puffs, there were dramatic changes,” Destaillats said. “Even the same device with the same e-liquid can give different emissions depending on how you use it.”

Researchers also found big emission differences between vaporizers with a single coil and double coil. (Destaillats explained that when the same voltage is split between two coils, as opposed to just one, fewer emissions are produced.) On the issue of voltage, the study found that as the battery power output increased, the average vapor temperature reached at a steady state was higher. As a result, as voltage went up, the amount of e-liquid consumed per puff was higher too.

Here again Destaillats emphasized that the findings don’t mean that lower temperatures make for safer vaping, saying: “By emitting less, the exposure may be less harmful…but we cannot say it’s safer or it’s healthier.”

Destaillats and his colleagues also examined how the age of a vaporizer affected emissions. In using a single vaping device for nine consecutive rounds of 50 puffs — similar to how an e-cigarette user would vape in real life — researchers found that aldehyde emissions increased by more than 60 percent, with greater contributions of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein. The effect was likely due to residue buildup inside the vaporizer, or what users call “coil gunk.”

Destaillats and study co-authors Mohamad Sleiman, Jennifer Logue, V. Nahuel Montesinos, Marion Russell, Marta Litter and Lara Gundel write:

Since harmful chemical emissions are primarily due to thermal decomposition of e-liquid constituents, reducing these temperatures is a promising approach to limiting the harm caused by e-cigarettes. Proper maintenance or more frequent replacement of coils may also reduce emissions by avoiding accumulation of polymeric residues. From the regulatory point of view, particularly in light of recent U.S. (Food and Drug Administration) regulations issued in May and European Union regulations from 2014, it should be highlighted that toxic emissions originate primarily from heating the solvents propylene glycol and glycerin, which are the constituents most commonly found in e-liquid formulations.

Destaillats told me that this study is far from comprehensive, as the market is home to hundreds of different e-liquids. But he said it does tease out the particular problem of solvents, which are a common e-liquid ingredient that when heated up do, indeed, emit harmful chemicals. Destaillats and colleagues will soon publish another study on secondhand e-cigarette exposures, attempting to measure the composition of e-cig vapors that people exhale.

He noted that because e-cigarette use among young people is growing so quickly and health officials worry such trends threaten to reverse hard-fought declines in traditional smoking, understanding the true harms posed by e-cigarettes is crucial.

“Yes, there is some urgency to this kind of research,” Destaillats said. “But we’re often behind because the technology changes so fast.”

To request a full copy of the e-cigarette emissions study, visit Environmental Science & Technology.

Kim Krisberg is a freelance public health writer living in Austin, Texas, and has been writing about public health for nearly 15 years.

kkrisberg Fri, 08/26/2016 - 17:00

Study: Flavoring chemicals linked to occupational illness found in electronic cigarettes

kkrisberg — Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:30:42 +0000

Study: Flavoring chemicals linked to occupational illness found in electronic cigarettes

In a recent study, Harvard public health researchers decided to test a few dozen types of electronic cigarettes for diacetyl, a flavoring chemical associated with a severe respiratory disease known as “popcorn lung.” The researchers found diacetyl in a majority of the e-cigarettes they tested. News outlets jumped on the findings, with some announcing that e-cigarettes could cause the often-debilitating respiratory disease.

But scientist Joseph Allen wants to be clear: His study doesn’t make a definitive statement about the effect of diacetyl in e-cigarettes. Instead, Allen said his goal was to elevate concerns about potentially harmful flavoring chemicals within larger conversations about e-cigarette safety and regulation.

“The reality is that the research is so nascent that we don’t know much about the risks of inhaling these flavoring chemicals,” Allen, an assistant professor in the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and director of the university’s Healthy Buildings Program, told me. “Our goal is to help make sure that flavorings are now part of the discussion.”

To conduct the study, which was published earlier this month in Environmental Health Perspectives, Allen and his research colleagues selected 51 types of flavored e-cigarettes sold by leading brands and which contained flavors that appeal to young people, such as cotton candy, tutti frutti and cupcake. They tested the products for diacetyl as well as flavoring chemicals acetoin and 2,3-pentanedione, which have also been tied to health risks in the workplace. In particular, diacetyl has been linked to severe respiratory disease in workers who inhale the flavoring chemical. Even more specifically, the chemical has been linked to severe bronchiolitis obliterans, an irreversible loss of respiratory function that can become so bad that its sufferers may require a lung transplant. The diacetyl-linked illness was first documented in workers who were exposed to the butter flavoring in popcorn processing factories, hence the term “popcorn lung.” (A recent news investigation also found worrisome levels of diacetyl exposure in the coffee roasting industry.)

Study authors Allen, Skye Flanigan, Mallory LeBlanc, Jose Vallarino, Piers MacNaughton, James Stewart and David Christiani write:

The heating, vaporization and subsequent inhalation of these flavoring chemicals in e-cigarettes makes an exposure pathway for these flavorings that has significant similarities to those of the workers at the microwave popcorn facilities. …Based on the widespread use of these food flavors across many industries and knowledge that specific chemicals/artificial flavors were developed to mimic certain natural flavors commonly used in e-cigarettes, we hypothesized that these compounds are likely used in the manufacturing of flavored e-cigarettes. We sought to expand the state of knowledge on flavoring chemicals in e-cigarettes with a particular focus on e-cigarettes sold by the largest cigarette companies and also those flavors that we deem would be appealing to children, teenagers and young adults.

To analyze the 51 types of flavored e-cigarettes chosen for the study, the researchers inserted each one into a sealed chamber attached to a device that drew air from the e-cigarette for eight seconds at a time. Here’s what they found: At least one of the three chemicals was found in 47 of the 51 flavors tested. Diacetyl was found in 39 flavors tested, while acetoin and 2,3-pentanedione were detected in 46 and 23 of the flavors, respectively. In addition to detecting diacetyl in e-cigarette flavors that may particularly appeal to young people, it was also found in flavors such as “tobacco” and “menthol.”

Both the Flavoring and Extract Manufacturers Association of the United States as well as the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration recognize the risks of inhaling diacetyl, Allen noted. The association recommends that workers be warned about the potential risks of inhaling such flavoring chemicals, while OSHA has established a National Emphasis Program focused on popcorn processing workers, though the agency has not yet established a Permissible Exposure Limit for diacetyl. However, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists have issued recommended worker exposure limits for diacetyl.

And Allen said that’s precisely what concerns him. In other words, if workers are being cautioned about exposures they may experience eight hours a day, five days a week, what does that mean for consumers of e-cigarettes who may be inhaling these chemicals for many more hours and with fewer breaks in between? Allen’s study doesn’t reveal the answer to this question, but he said knowing more about the chemical content of e-cigarettes will at least help consumers make more informed choices.

“These warnings are being given to workers, but not to consumers,” Allen told me. “So we hope this kind of research will raise awareness about the potential hazard.”

In conclusion, Allen and his study colleagues write that “urgent action is recommended to further evaluate the extent of this new exposure to diacetyl and related flavoring compounds in e-cigarettes.” As for the next phase in Allen’s research, he’s received funding to expand the sample of e-cigarettes tested and study the effect of e-cigarette vapors on upper airway cells.

“We want to better understand the risk,” he told me. “We just don’t have enough information yet to determine a safe level of exposure…and yet we have more than 1 million kids trying e-cigarettes.”

Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s authority to regulate tobacco products does not extend to e-cigarettes. However, proposed regulations that would bring the products under FDA’s authority are currently in review. Members of Congress recently rejected an attempt to include a provision in the budget agreement that would have curbed FDA’s authority over e-cigarettes.

To download a full copy of the new e-cigarette and diacetyl study, visit Environmental Health Perspectives.

Kim Krisberg is a freelance public health writer living in Austin, Texas, and has been writing about public health for nearly 15 years.

kkrisberg Wed, 12/16/2015 - 11:30

CDC: Current, former smokers biggest users of electronic cigarettes

kkrisberg — Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:03:25 +0000

CDC: Current, former smokers biggest users of electronic cigarettes

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released the first nationally representative estimates of electronic cigarette use among U.S. adults, finding that more than 12 percent had ever tried the aerosol nicotine products in 2014. So, as is the unfortunate case with many emerging and potential public health threats, it seems like e-cigarette use is outpacing the ability of regulatory bodies to protect the public’s health and educate consumers about possible risks.

The new data is from CDC’s National Health Interview Survey, which first began collecting data on e-cigarette use in 2014. According to the data, in 2014, men were more likely than women to have tried e-cigarettes, but not as likely to be current users. Younger adults were more likely than older adults to be current e-cigarette smokers, while American Indian, Alaska Native and white adults were more likely than black, Asian and Hispanic adults to have ever tried e-cigarettes or be current users.

Interestingly, but perhaps not surprisingly, e-cigarette use was highest among current cigarette smokers and those who had recently quit conventional cigarettes. Overall, nearly one in 10 adults ages 18-24 who had never tried a conventional cigarette had tried an e-cigarette. (This is worrisome because after decades of hard work on the part of public health workers to reduce smoking rates and prevent tobacco-related death, there is real concern that electronic cigarettes may drive more people toward trying conventional cigarettes and eventually getting hooked.) The new data also revealed that among current cigarette smokers who had tried to quit in the past year, more than 50 percent had ever tried an e-cigarette and more than 20 percent were current e-cigarette users. E-cigarettes are often marketed as a smoking cessation product, however the jury is still out on whether they’re effective cessation tools and whether e-cigarettes are actually a safer alternative.

In reference to this particular finding — which points to current and former cigarette smokers being the majority of e-cigarettes users — Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said: “This does not tell us whether e-cigarettes are effective at helping cigarette smokers quit. But it does point out the importance of FDA regulation to determine whether e-cigarettes are effective at helping cigarette smokers quit and, equally important, to provide cigarette smokers accurate information about which e-cigarettes are most effective at doing so.”

The CDC survey also found that more than 20 percent of adults ages 18 to 24 had ever tried an e-cigarette, with such use declining as survey respondents got older. About 3.7 percent of adults currently used e-cigarettes every day or some days, with current e-cigarette use among American Indian and Alaska Native adults at more than 10 percent. More than 4 percent of white adults reported current e-cigarette use, as did just more than 2 percent of Hispanic adults, 1.8 percent of black adults and 1.5 percent of Asian adults. Among current cigarette smokers, about one in six — as well as nearly one in four former smokers who recently quit — currently used e-cigarettes. In comparison, just more than 2 percent of long-term former smokers and less than 1 percent of adults who had never smoked cigarettes currently used e-cigarettes.

“If there is a public health benefit to the emergence of e-cigarettes, it will come only if they are effective at helping smokers stop using cigarettes completely and if they are marketed so they do not re-glamorize smoking among young people,” Myers said. “Effective FDA oversight is critical to achieving these goals.”

Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sent its final rule for regulating electronic cigarettes to the White House for review.

To read the new data in full, visit the CDC National Center for Health Statistics.

Kim Krisberg is a freelance public health writer living in Austin, Texas, and has been writing about public health for more than a decade.

kkrisberg Wed, 10/28/2015 - 14:03

Just remember -- if the battery vents or explodes -- don't inhale.

That hydrogen fluoride released when the cheap batteries fail doesn't hurt your for a few hours. Then it's permanent damage.
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/35988#

CDC: American youth now use e-cigarettes more than any other tobacco product

kkrisberg — Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:49:15 +0000

CDC: American youth now use e-cigarettes more than any other tobacco product

In just a year, electronic cigarette use has tripled among American teens. And considering that no one really knows what the related health impacts are and any regulatory framework is lagging far behind the growing popularity of e-cigarettes, public health advocates say it’s time for action.

Earlier this week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data from the 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey finding that current e-cigarette use among high school students, which is defined as using at least once in the prior 30 days, nearly tripled — from 4.5 percent in 2013 to 13.4 percent in 2014. In sheer numbers that means e-cigarette use grew from about 660,000 high school students to 2 million. Among middle school students, e-cigarette use more than tripled, from 1.1 percent in 2013 to 3.9 percent in 2014. CDC reports that for the first time since the youth survey began collecting information on the new trend, current e-cigarette use has officially surpassed the use of every other tobacco product. E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that heat up liquid mixtures usually containing nicotine and other flavorings and produce a vapor that users inhale.

While the CDC data did find declines in cigarette smoking among high school students — the 2014 rate was 9.2 percent, a new low — increases in e-cigarette and hookah use offset those gains, resulting in no real change in overall tobacco use among high school and middle school students. Overall, about 4.6 million middle and high school students currently use some type of tobacco product. The new data were published in this week’s issue of CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

In reacting to the new data, Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said:

The dramatic decline in youth cigarette smoking is terrific news for our nation’s health and shows that the fight against tobacco is winnable if we do what we know works. However, the skyrocketing use of e-cigarettes is frightening and threatens this progress. It should spur strong and prompt action to prevent kids from using any tobacco product, not just cigarettes. We cannot allow the tobacco industry to keep addicting kids and create another epidemic with a new generation of tobacco products.

These survey results show why the Food and Drug Administration must act with urgency to protect our kids and issue a final rule to regulate all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, cigars and hookah. We again call on the FDA and the Obama Administration to issue a final rule by April 25 — one year after the FDA issued a proposed rule — and to close gaps in the rule by cracking down on marketing and flavors that appeal to kids. The FDA first announced in early 2011 that it planned to regulate e-cigarettes, cigars and other unregulated tobacco products, so these important public health protections are long overdue. We cannot afford more delays that allow the tobacco industry to continue targeting our kids with unregulated tobacco products.

And in a similar reaction from the American Lung Association, CEO and President Harold Wimmer said:

Previous studies should have served as warning bells to the federal government that FDA oversight of all tobacco products was urgently needed. Today’s study highlights the consequences of allowing these products to remain without oversight.

April 25 will mark the one-year anniversary from when FDA’s proposed rule was released, and over four years after FDA first announced its plan to oversee cigars, e-cigarettes and hookah. It is time for the Obama Administration to act with urgency.

The new CDC data found that in 2014, the most commonly used tobacco products among high school students were e-cigarettes, followed by hookahs (9.4 percent), cigarettes (9.2 percent), cigars (8.2 percent), smokeless tobacco (5.5 percent), snus (1.9 percent) and pipes (1.5 percent). Hookah use about doubled among middle school students, from 1.1 percent in 2013 to 2.5 percent in 2014, and among high school students, from 5.2 percent in 2013 to 9.4 percent in 2014. Overall, there were about 1.6 million young hookah users in 2014.

Research on the short- and long-term effects of e-cigarettes, which often contain a mixture of chemicals and flavorings, is still very much emerging, but most researchers agree that whether or not the novelty products are less harmful than cigarettes is yet to be known. One research article published just this week in the journal Tobacco Control found that “some flavour chemicals in e-cigarette fluids are sufficiently high for inhalation exposure by vaping to be of toxicological concern.” (And this recent in-depth investigation into worker exposure to diacetyl, a chemical that can permanently damage the lungs, also explored the chemical’s use in e-cigarettes.) However, one issue advocates are quick to point out is that the e-cigarette industry is using many of the same tactics to appeal to young people as Big Tobacco did. For instance, many e-cigarette flavors seem eerily kid-friendly, with flavors such as cotton candy, banana split and cherry crush.

Today, FDA only regulates e-cigarettes that are marketed for therapeutic purposes; however, the agency will be collecting public comments on its third and final public workshop on e-cigarettes and public health through July 2. For more on the June 1-2 FDA workshop and info on submitting comments, click here.

For a full copy of the new youth e-cigarette data, visit CDC. For more coverage of the data, including interviews with youth e-cigarette users, check out this New York Times article.

Kim Krisberg is a freelance public health writer living in Austin, Texas, and has been writing about public health for more than a decade.

kkrisberg Fri, 04/17/2015 - 11:49

In my hometown, empty e-cig boxes have replaced the cigarette butts that I used to see on the side of the road. The jump in the number of young users is very troubling

As a fair warning I am commenting as part of an assignment for the University of Pretoria, but this topic is particularly interesting to me as I am a user of the e-cigarette. What a lot of data does not clearly state, but what I can confidently state from personal experience and observation of many other "smokers" around me, is that many of the e-cigarette users still smoke regular brand cigarettes. This brings to mind the thought that perhaps the increase in the use of e-cigarettes may actually be more detrimental to young people who smoke, than helpful. It could become a "gateway" to smoking regular cigarettes, or it could double the amount of damage being done to regular smokers, who are now smoking both kinds of cigarette. Just an interesting thought which does not seem to be of much concern at this stage but perhaps should be? 15385010

As I see it, the idea that e-cigarettes are less harmful than regular ones is plausible, but there's no solid evidence either way. We do know, however, that nicotine itself has risks, including birth defects, so e-cigs are not harmless.

Common sense says they should be restricted the same way that regular cigarettes are. No sales to children, all marketing must be targeted to adult users.

Unfortunately, their marketers are very clever indeed and have convinced their regular users that any attempts at regulation are part of a nefarious plot to ban the product and force them back to regular tobacco products.

The nicotine in e-cigarettes is addictive. When a user stops using it, he/she can experience withdrawal symptoms including depression, restlessness and anxiety.it can also harm a person's arteries over time.This is dangerous, especially for growing teens. The alarming rate of increase in e-cigarette usage among teens could indicate a future health problems. However tests prove that the levels of dangerous chemicals given off by e-cigarettes are a fraction of what is given off by a real cigarette. Smoking, in general has many side effects, including lung cancer and its user statistics should be decreasing instead of increasing. Teenagers have their entire lives ahead of them, hence the smoking statistics among teens should decrease.
15021565

As Damon Xavier Laurent said, most e-cigarette smokers smoke regular cigarettes too- this i can say from personal experience. Yet the problem with e-cigarettes is that smokers think that this is a healthy alternative for their unhealthy smoking habits, because when smoking an e-cigarette it does not feel like it has the same effects on your lungs as a cigarette has.
Something that could perhaps bring down the amount of e-cigarette smokers is if e-cigarette producers print the dangers that e-cigarettes can have on the packaging, just like cigarette producers do.

Caffeine is also addictive as hell, as any serious coffee drinker will attest. Migraine-like headaches, inability to concentrate, irritable mood, cravings, etc. etc. So if it's addiction we're concerned about, then consistency also requires raising the age of access to caffeine, and taking it out of beverages that are flavored to attract kids (e.g. soft drinks, sweetened coffees, etc.).

The solution to all of this is really simple: age 18 for access to caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, or any product containing any of the same except upon a valid prescription by a board-licensed medical doctor (e.g. cannabis for chemo patients). Note that we have seen a huge rise in collegiate binge drinking as a direct correlate (probably causal) of the change of the drinking age to 21.

Another exception that's worthwhile is for parentally-supervised usage down to age 16. That would enable socialization of the use of these substances in a controlled setting, which would further decrease the degree of abuse in later life.

There's no need to generate a bunch of moralistic emotionalism about the "evils" of smoking (or "steaming", as e-cig usage ought to be known): it comes across as more Reefer Madness and imperils the credibility of health arguements generally. And let's not forget that forbidden fruits taste even sweeter. Frankly in light of the addictiveness of caffeine, and the addictiveness and enormous dangers of alcohol, it also comes across as hypocritical: "My drugs are OK but yours are evil." Bah humbug to that.

do e cigarettes also contain nicotine?and if they do how is it built and why is the government allowing a new form of drug which seems that teenagers are likely to get addicted too?

u15341240

how are e-cigarretes different from the other tobacco products?Don't they all contain nicotine?u14231591

E-cigarettes should not be a substitute for tobacco cigarettes, they contain toxic chemicals including nicotine which is also addictive and may damage the proteins in the lungs.15147208

I think the idea of e cigarettes is quite appropriate but given the high increase in students smoking it, rises quite a shock to see this, especially that a huge debate about it's long term and short term symptoms/ health issues still continuing, maybe a different approach can be made or even further study this before fully implementing it worldwide. 15238122

From personal experience E-cigs have really changed my daily life. I enjoy smoking and the benefits that come with it but was becoming so expensive along with the negative health affects. E cigs have relieved alot of the health related issues to do with smoking despite the high nicotine concentration. I just moderate it accordingly but really has provided a “healthi- er” option for those who chose to intake nicotine and who would prefer a better smell taste and less deadly option

It is about time research is done to show weather e-cigarettes are as detrimental to ones health as normal cigarettes. With that said, I do not approve of them as they are tobacco products and seem better in that they smell and taste better, this attracts more people to them and this is evident as more teenagers are smoking them now so even though they may be less deadly, the affect more people so are they worth it?
14258537

I am not a smoker myself and I grew up in a household were smoking was not part of the everyday routine, however I have seen first-hand how deadly the effects of tobacco and nicotine products can be, especially after prolonged use of these products. I don't think the e-cigarette are in anyway a better option for smokers than regular cigarettes, it is just a more attractive option (better smell and taste). More research must be conducted in order for us to see how damaging the e-cigarettes really are.

From what I have read It appears that e-cigarettes are less harmful than actual cigarettes. From what I understand they contain little if no harmful toxins such as tar and carbon monoxide which both cause lung cancer. I do, however, wonder if the increased rates of youths smoking e-cigarettes may not cause teens to begin smoking actual cigarettes. I also wonder if there isn't more research into the true effects of smoking e-cigarettes.

This whole "somebody do something for the children!" mentality has gotten so out of control in this country. We should celebrate that children are smoking less and using something less dangerous.

Yes, it hasn't been scientifically established that vaping is less dangerous than smoking. However, anyone with half a brain can come to the conclusion that the hundreds of cancer causing ingredients in cigarettes are more dangerous to someone's health in comparison to the, by far, most often used three chemical formulation of e-juice (nicotine, propylene glycol- the same chemical used in asthma inhalers, and vegetable glycerin) And anyone with personal experience using both can tell you that it is less dangerous based on the state of their health alone. This a good thing and has been a miracle for many. It will extend many people's lives and even the lives of our children.

This is a nation full of paranoid parents who think they have carte blanche to restrict the freedom of grown adults to do as they please simply because some new trend seems bad. The majority of these people have no first hand experience with cigarettes or e-juice, having never tried either, who have so much self-righteousness and superiority complex to think they know better than the people it most directly affects to the point of forcing them to comply with the will of others to tell them what they can or cannot put into their bodies.

I love vaping. It has been a miracle for myself and many others. I do not smoke the occasional cigarette. I never smoke anymore. I do not plan to stop vaping because I like nicotine just as you like caffeine and alcohol. But I don't try to restrict your freedom to it. Nicotine on its face its not as harmful a drug as it is claimed to be. It is the smoking of nicotine or possibly the inhalation through vaping of it into the lungs which is most damaging. If you were to consume it in low doses through drinking or food it would be much more akin to the damages of caffeine (increases heart rate, blood flow
problems, etc). They are both stimulants.

Vapera see exactly where this is going. And we don't all think its some sort of conspiracy. But it is obvious that ill informed fascists are having knee jerk reactions are demanding to restrict our freedom.

Why shouldn't I be able to buy an e-juice flavor that tastes good? I'm 31 years old and I like to eat cotton candy and like the flavor of sweets. They are trying to do the same thing that they did with cigarettes. They want to make it taste terrible and tax the heck out of it to gain revenue. Even know this has never even been shown to be an effective method for reduction of use in the past with cigarettes.

Cigarettes and e-cigs are completely different things. They should be treated differently. I'm not advocating for zero regulation but it shouldn't be regulated exactly like or to the same extent as cigarettes. What most paranoid alarmists are doing is essentially wanting to transform e-juice and e-cigarettes into a more similar product. If some of this discussed regulation happens; many adult vapors and children will turn back to regular cigarettes to get their nictotine because there will no longer be that many obvious differences or benefits.

And what you will be essentially doing is advocating the genocide of that group of people who do not have the willpower to live without nictotine when there is a readily available and potentially non cancer causing or less cancer causing alternative. You could even consider vaping a medicine to the addiction of cigarettes. But you want to rush to demonize it. Shame on you all.

Replacing E-cigs for regular smokes is like replacing heroin with methadone. It a treatment, sort of...

"... offset those gains, resulting in no real change in overall tobacco use among high school and middle school students."

Could you please in the future replace statements such as "overall tobacco use" with "overall nicotine use" - because e-cigarettes are not a tobacco product in anything other than a legislative sense. The only commonality between e-cigarettes and analog/lit cigarettes is the nicotine. It is rather like saying that nicotine patches/inhalers/lozenges/gum are tobacco products - or we could go further with categorizing every foodstuff in the nightshade family as tobacco products.