Louisiana Bucket Brigade

An incident almost every day: Louisiana Bucket Brigade reports on 2011 refinery accidents

egrossman — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:01:01 +0000

An incident almost every day: Louisiana Bucket Brigade reports on 2011 refinery accidents

by Elizabeth Grossman

The good news is that in 2011 there were 53 fewer reported refinery accidents in Louisiana than there were in 2010. The bad news is that the 301 refinery accidents reported to the state in 2011 released nearly 50,000 pounds more air pollutants and nearly 1 million gallons more contaminants to soil and water than did the 354 accidents reported in 2010 – this according to a new report released Monday by the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and United Steelworkers. “Our aim is to collaborate with the refineries to solve the problem. Unfortunately that day hasn’t come yet,” said Louisiana Bucket Brigade founding director Anne Rolfes on a call with reporters. “Refinery managers continue to act as if they don’t have an accident problem. Until they face the facts, the oil industry, our economy, our environment and our health will suffer,” said Ms Rolfes.

The report’s release comes less than three weeks after a fire and explosion on an oil platform off the Louisiana coast killed three workers and injured 9, three seriously – and while a Shell Chemical in Norco, Louisiana continued to flare as it had for more than 30 hours.

The report, which is based on refineries’ reporting of accidents to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), found that in 2011 the state’s 17 refineries reported to the state 301 accidents that released more than 1 million pounds of air contaminants and more than 1.3 million gallons of pollutants to soil and water. Among these emissions are sulfur dioxide, benzene, hydrogen sulfide, 1,3-butadiene, and miscellaneous other volatile organic compounds. These substances are all associated with potentially serious adverse health effects, including cardiovascular and respiratory diseases; neurological, immune and respiratory system impacts; and cancer. According to US Census figures and the report’s analysis, more than 200,000 people in Louisiana live within two miles of a refinery. This industry is “clearly externalizing its costs on Louisiana,” said Ms. Rolfes.

LABB also notes that what’s reported to LDEQ by the refineries may actually underreport the full extent of these accidental releases. A June 2012 benzene leak from Exxon Mobil’s Baton Rouge refinery was initially reported at 10 pounds. Days later, that amount was revised to nearly 30,000 pounds.

The vast majority of these accidents were caused by some type of equipment failure or something that went wrong in maintenance or operations. The accident-cause categories in LABB’s report, are those used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission in their voluntary effort to evaluate “unplanned” refinery emissions not covered by state or federal permits. Going back to 2005, when LABB’s refinery database timeline begins, the leading specific cause for accidents at Louisiana refineries was non-specific “equipment failure” at 17.4% followed by “piping or tubing” and “process upset.” More than 20% of these accidents had “no information given” as their cause. Among the 2011 accidents, the only outstanding other cause cited was weather (included in refineries’ reports to LDEQ), which was assigned responsibility for nearly one-third of 2011 accidents at Exxon Mobil’s Baton Rouge refinery.

The report’s top recommendation is “Hire more full-time workers.” Contractors, notes the report, “may be temporary, receive less training and can be terminated easily.” There are “not enough workers present to do adequate maintenance,” said United Steelworkers (USW) spokesperson Lynne Hancock during the press call. “Workers are being asked to do more with less…Workers are really scared. They’re being asked to run enormous units virtually single-handedly,” said Ms. Hancock. “Solving refinery accidents would be good for the economy in Louisiana,” she added, as it would mean “hiring more workers and buying more equipment.”

Assertions of safety; record of poor performance
The Louisiana oil industry has criticized LABB’s accident reporting. “If this report is anything like the previous three reports, it will be filled with errors that misrepresent the data,” said Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association president Chris John in a statement. “We recognize there are risks associated with our operations and we work at all levels – whether people or processes – to make sure everyone goes home safely every day,” said Mr. John. “Safety is of paramount importance to the oil and gas industry – and our record proves it. Louisiana’s industry works hard every day to ensure the safety of our employees, our neighbors and the public. Across the board, accidents, injuries, and emissions are at historic lows. Any refusal to acknowledge this is ignoring the truth.”

Yet in December 2011, the EPA’s Inspector General released a report that cited Louisiana for “poor performance” in Clean Air Act and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA regulates solid and hazardous waste) enforcement, noting that “State, EPA regional, and external interview responses attributed Louisiana’s poor performance to several factors, including a lack of resources, natural disasters, and culture in which the state agency is expected to protect industry.”

One oil industry criticism has been that LABB includes in its refinery accident database releases that are “below reportable quantities.” Ms. Rolfes explained that LABB includes all accidents reported to the LDEQ, whether or not the reporting threshold, which varies by substance released, was exceeded. She also gave examples of releases below reportable quantities that had resulted in serious injuries and a fatality – one 2010 incident at Exxon Mobil’s Baton Rouge facility that cause a fire that severely burned several workers, and a 2007 hydrogen sulfide release at a ConocoPhillips Lake Charles refinery that killed one worker.

Meanwhile, a look at another gauge of the oil industry’s environmental and safety performance appears to confirm the prevalence of accidents documented by LABB. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), the federal bureau that oversees the US offshore oil and gas industry, database of recent incidents and accidents, shows more than 100 fires or explosions on Gulf of Mexico oil platforms each year between 2007 and 2011 (with 71 to date in 2012). The annual injury rates BSEE records at these platforms range from a high of 423 in 2007 to the 141 recorded so far this year. During each of these years there were at least four spills of more than 50 barrels of oil from these facilities. (It’s not possible to tell from the database alone if these numbers include 2010’s BP/Deepwater Horizon disaster that spilled nearly five million barrels of oil – and which may still be leaking.) Additionally, in each year between 2007 and 2012, the US Gulf of Mexico platforms also experienced at least one “loss of well control,” resulting in some kind of uncontrolled fluid flow. Altogether, the “incidents” recorded by BSEE for Gulf of Mexico oil platforms ranged from a high of 890 in 207, to 321 to date in 2012, or an average of abut 636 a year. The numbers have been decreasing, but they remain close to one “incident” a day. Which begs the question: On or offshore, is one “incident” a day a safety record that should be improved upon?

Elizabeth Grossman is the author of Chasing Molecules: Poisonous Products, Human Health, and the Promise of Green Chemistry, High Tech Trash: Digital Devices, Hidden Toxics, and Human Health, and other books. Her work has appeared in a variety of publications including Scientific American, Salon, The Washington Post, The Nation, Mother Jones, Grist, and the Huffington Post. Chasing Molecules was chosen by Booklist as one of the Top 10 Science & Technology Books of 2009 and won a 2010 Gold Nautilus Award for investigative journalism.

egrossman Thu, 12/06/2012 - 05:01

Will Gulf Coast ecosystem restoration include restoring the health of its people?

egrossman — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:56:26 +0000

Will Gulf Coast ecosystem restoration include restoring the health of its people?

By Elizabeth Grossman

It's now almost eleven months since the BP/Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded, killing 11 workers, and almost eight months since the damaged well was capped. While the emergency phase of this disaster is over, the assessment of and response to its long-term impacts are just now getting underway. On February 28th, the Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force held the second of its five planned meetings - this one in New Orleans - and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) launched its long-term study to evaluate health effects of the oil spill disaster response work. And on March 3rd, the Louisiana Bucket Brigade (LABB) released its survey of the disaster's immediate health and economic impacts on coastal Louisiana communities, a study that LABB founding director Anne Rolfes describes as "the first step in a process."

The oil may have stopped gushing from the Macondo well, but as evident from comments voiced by Gulf Coast residents at the Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force meeting in New Orleans, the disaster is far from over. Emotions rose to the surface as public participants - many of them leaders of regional community groups - shared their concerns about the restoration process and long-term impacts of the oil during the hour of the day-long meeting devoted to public comments.

"The elephant in the room is the health effects that are happening right now to the people of the Gulf. How can you talk about restoring the ecosystem if the health of the people is deteriorating?" said a woman who identified herself as a New Orleans native.
"If you go out to the marsh now it is silent. The marsh is not supposed to be silent. It is supposed to be filled with dragonflies and grasshoppers and little seed-bugs that feed on the marsh grasses. But it was silent all summer. It is silent this winter and it is going to turn into a silent spring," said Linda Hooper-Bui, associate professor of entomology at Louisiana State University.
"All these people and these cameras don't mean nothing to me - this coast does," said a woman who identified herself as the wife of a commercial fisherman in Venice, LA. "We live here, we want our place to be sustainable...I won't eat the seafood and I won't feed it to my kids."
"Citizens need to be actively involved," said Casi Calloway, executive director of the Mobile Baykeeper, a recommendation offered by many of those who spoke who, like Calloway, expressed concern that as currently structured, the federally led restoration effort would leave locals on the margins.

Created by President Obama with an Executive Order on October 5, 2010, the Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force has been directed to develop a Gulf-wide restoration plan within a year. The Executive Order defines "ecosystem restoration" to include all activities that initiate or accelerate "the recovery of an ecosystem, or the services it provides" in order to "strengthen [the Gulf's] ability to support the diverse economies, communities, and cultures of the region," but it does not explicitly mention human health. Residents at the New Orleans meeting made it clear that to succeed, a Gulf Coast restoration plan must include human health and welfare.

Or as Anne Rolfes said during a conference all discussing the organization's new study, "The people who live on the Gulf Coast are part of the ecosystem."

Bucket Brigade report highlights gaps and offers recommendations
For its report Bucket Brigade staff and volunteers interviewed 954 people in 15 coastal Louisiana communities between July 26 and October 1, 2010. The study offers a snapshot of community health and includes respondents' recommendations for addressing the problems they report. Among the report's key findings:

Nearly half of all respondents reported an unusual increase in health symptoms, including coughs, headaches, and skin and eye irritation; as a corollary, about one-third of those surveyed said they'd used over-the-counter medications more than usual in response to their symptoms
There are limited treatment options because few local medical providers are trained to diagnose and treat chemical exposure
44% of those said their household's primary income-provider had been impacted by the disaster; about 25% said they needed but had not received financial assistance
64% expressed concern about seafood contamination

What the findings point to are "gaps - problems that seem abundant but where there's not been much follow up," said Rolfes, noting that this can be said of both economic and health problems. Key gaps identified by LABB are a lack of local medical expertise in diagnosing and treating health effects of chemical exposures and a lack of baseline information on Gulf Coast residents' ongoing exposure to chemical contaminants in a region with a high concentration of oil refineries and petrochemical plants, as well as work that may put people in proximity to oil-related contaminants. At the top of respondents' lists of suggestions for addressing these issues:

Create access to long-term health care for mental health and exÂ¬posure-related illnesses;
Don't study people - treat their health problems; "Residents are tired of being studied. The need for health care has been clearly expressed....Work regarding the oil spill should have a treatment component."
Train and hire local residents to conduct environmental monitoring and restoration work, including seafood sampling;
Pursue a restoration economy

"The Gulf ecosystem task force was here on Monday and it not clear to me if they have a process for deeply engaging with people deeply to create a restoration economy," said Rolfes, expressing a sentiment at the heart of most of comments made by public participants at the task force meeting on the 28th. "I've been doing this work since 1999," said Rolfes, and "historically I've never seen the state intervene proactively."

An ambitious federal study
Whether this will change as a result of what's learned through the NIEHS Gulf Worker health effects study or what the Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force learns in the course of its regional meetings, remains to be seen. But Dale Sandler, chief of the NIEHS epidemiology branch and principal investigator on the BP/Deepwater Horizon response-worker health study also cited the lack of local medical expertise in working with chemical exposures and lack of baseline data as key challenges for the study.

"This will be the largest study ever conducted on the health effect of an oil spill," said Sandler, who explained that health effects studies have only been done for eight of the 40 large oil spills that occurred over the past 50 years.

With the aim of enrolling 55,000 people who participated in cleanup work, the study will reach out to some 100,000 with the aim of following about 20,000 participants on a yearly basis over the course of ten years. Anyone over 21 who participated in any type of cleanup work - including support work - for at least one day is eligible to participate. Everyone who went through a response-worker safety training program will receive a letter inviting participation. At the end of April, NIEHS will assess recruitment progress to see how many people have responded and if additional such efforts need to be made.

For those in the annual-contact group, the study will involve a home visit; questions about work history, and lifestyle (including fish consumption); collections of blood, urine, toenail, hair, and house dust samples; and clinical measurements that will include glucose levels, lung function, and blood pressure. Mental health will also be part of the survey. This data will be analyzed for correlations with environmental monitoring data and with "what people did where and when" during cleanup activities, explained Sandler, while noting the challenge of separating potential exposure to oil-spill related contaminants and stressors from those otherwise experienced by Gulf Coast residents. Medical referrals will be offered, but these will be focused on health conditions that include cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

While accident, illness and injury records compiled during the height of the response - by NIOSH, BP, the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, among others - logged in hundreds of health complaints, currently there is no apparent organized scientific or medical study that has already begun to document systematically any long-term health effects of the clean-up work or related contaminant exposure. What the Louisiana Bucket Brigade has documented in its survey, and what Gulf residents said to the Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force last week, make it clear that contaminant exposure resulting from the oil disaster is an urgent and ongoing concern - one that needs immediate attention.

egrossman Tue, 03/08/2011 - 04:56