One of the latest institutional open-access policies comes from Harvard Business School (hat tip to Stuart Shieber).
This is the same school that plays horrendous anti-library, anti-education games with their flagship Harvard Business Review.
My head hurts.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
In today's NYTimes: At Harvard, a Proposal to Publish Free on Web:
Faculty members are scheduled to vote on a measure that would permit Harvard to distribute their scholarship online, instead of signing exclusive agreements with scholarly journals that often have tiny readerships and high…
Monday - time to check out PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine and PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, as well as, of course, PLoS ONE.
As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various…
Cliff Lynch on institutional repositories. I don't agree with quite all of it (institutional repositories are here to stay? really? in this budget environment? sez who?), but an hour with Cliff Lynch is always an hour well spent, and I'm completely and unabashedly with him on his cautions about IRs…
Much is murky in open access, but this at least is clear: academic libraries have committed different amounts of money and staff toward an open-access future, from a flat zero up to hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth.
It's the zeroes and near-zeroes that concern me (why, hello there, Yale, and…
As a former business librarian in a public library setting, in regards to the Harvard Business Review (not to mention the case studies),I can only say: Once again, you have hit the nail squarely on the head!!
It was news to me that HBR is NOT peer reviewed. Will their prestige suddenly plummet?
Hah. That would be nice, wouldn't it?