Cognitive dissonance

One of the latest institutional open-access policies comes from Harvard Business School (hat tip to Stuart Shieber).

This is the same school that plays horrendous anti-library, anti-education games with their flagship Harvard Business Review.

My head hurts.

More like this

In today's NYTimes: At Harvard, a Proposal to Publish Free on Web: Faculty members are scheduled to vote on a measure that would permit Harvard to distribute their scholarship online, instead of signing exclusive agreements with scholarly journals that often have tiny readerships and high…
In an Open Letter to the American Chemical Society my Scibling Janet Stemwedel at Adventures in Ethics and Science, an ACS member, asked several pointed questions about how the Society was running its publications. One of the flagship publications is Chemical & Engineering News, whose editor in…
Monday - time to check out PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine and PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, as well as, of course, PLoS ONE. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various…
Apps are too much like 1990's CD-ROMs and not enough like the Web Open Access to Scientific Research Can Save Lives The OA Interviews: Harvard’s Stuart Shieber (Pay special note to the comment by Sandy Thatcher and the devastating fisking of it by Stuart Shieber. And by devastating, I mean dev. a.…

As a former business librarian in a public library setting, in regards to the Harvard Business Review (not to mention the case studies),I can only say: Once again, you have hit the nail squarely on the head!!

It was news to me that HBR is NOT peer reviewed. Will their prestige suddenly plummet?

By Robin Sinn (not verified) on 04 Mar 2010 #permalink