It's always intriguing to know what the peer-reviewers have thought and written about a particular manuscript. Now, you can find out, at least in some cases, on PLoS-ONE papers. Chris Surridge explains.
I guess you know that already, but just in case: "Biology Direct" always has the referee's comments as part of the published papers, and they come with the name of the referee. see http://www.biology-direct.com/
And they have some weird papers, too. Check the last one by Eugene Koonin (the one with 'eternal inflation' in the title.
I guess you know that already, but just in case: "Biology Direct" always has the referee's comments as part of the published papers, and they come with the name of the referee. see http://www.biology-direct.com/
And they have some weird papers, too. Check the last one by Eugene Koonin (the one with 'eternal inflation' in the title.
Yes, I am aware of it. That is excellent.
And yes, weird paper, isn't it?