It's always intriguing to know what the peer-reviewers have thought and written about a particular manuscript. Now, you can find out, at least in some cases, on PLoS-ONE papers. Chris Surridge explains.
More like this
There is a change in the command center of PLoS ONE this month. The transition will be seamless.
Via Evolving Thoughts comes news that the Public Library of Science (PLoS) is starting a series of blogs to promote its recently announced in
PLoS ONE is the first and (so far) the most successful scientific journal specifically geared to meet the brave new world
I buried this information between numerous pretty pictures in a yesterday's post, so let me now tell you a little bit more.
I guess you know that already, but just in case: "Biology Direct" always has the referee's comments as part of the published papers, and they come with the name of the referee. see http://www.biology-direct.com/
And they have some weird papers, too. Check the last one by Eugene Koonin (the one with 'eternal inflation' in the title.
Yes, I am aware of it. That is excellent.
And yes, weird paper, isn't it?