Cognitive Daily

Correction

A reader pointed out to me that Schultze’s 1978 study did not find a bias to hear a fast tempo as speeding up and slow tempo as slowing down. In fact, Schultze found that we were remarkably accurate at detecting tempo changes. So we do replicate Schultze! A misreading on my part of Quinn and Watt led to the confusion.

However, Quinn and Watt do cite a 1997 article which claims to find the bias I describe in the post from yesterday and the day before.

I haven’t been able to get my hands on the article, but here’s the reference:

Vos, P. G., van Assen, M., & Fraiiek, M. (1997) Perceived tempo change is dependent on base tempo and direction of change: Evidence for a generalized version of Schulze’s (1978) internal beat model. Psychological Research, 59, 240-247.

Comments

  1. #1 Maarten Inklaar
    January 10, 2008

    I found the article via Web of Science, and Springerlink.com hosts it. The problem is probably the name of the third author, which is not Fraiiek, but Fra┼łek (an n with an inverse ^), and is listed as Franek. If you are unable to access the document I would be happy to send it to you.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.