Dinosaur DNA discovered in GenBank

Is it real or is it April Fools?

The March 21st issue of Science has an interesting news article by Elizabeth Pennisi and a letter to the editor about a proposal to wikify GenBank. Currently, the NCBI holds the original authors responsible for editing or correcting entries and this does cause problems when those authors fail to return to the scene and fix what they've submitted. Some researchers are suggesting that third parties be allowed to fix some of those mistakes or at least add comments to records, to warn the unwary.

There are some good arguments on both sides and it's certainly easy to see why the NCBI would be reluctant to take on the assignment of having to arbitrate disagreements between researchers.

Besides, if we cleaned up GenBank, we'd lose charming entries (and great teaching examples) like this:

i-247f6779a3aa97d496ca11d60e6e416e-dinosaur.png

References:

Elizabeth Pennisi, "Proposal to 'Wikify' GenBank Meets Stiff Resistance," Science 21 March 2008 319:1598 - 1599 (subscription required).

More like this

It's pretty common these days to pick up an issue of Science or Nature and see people ranting about GenBank (1). Many of the rants are triggered, at least in part, by a wide-spread misunderstanding of what GenBank is and how it works. Perhaps this can be solved through education, but I don't…
or is it just an idea that's ahead of the curve? Last week, I was stunned to discover at least 31 papers in an NCBI Gene database entry that were in the entry for the wrong gene. I wrote about this here, here, here, and here. Now, an oversight like this is a little understandable. The titles…
For those that haven't heard about the NASA/arsenic bacteria story that's been exploding all over the science blogosphere over the last couple of weeks, I like the summary over at Jonathan Eisen's Tree of Life blog: NASA announced a major press conference at the conference they discussed a new…
Recently, Steinn brought our attention to some of the difficulties involved in getting a scientific journal to publish a "Comment" on an article. He drew on a document (PDF) by Prof. Rick Trebino of the Georgia Institute of Technology School of Physics detailing (in 123 numbered steps) his own…

And what is that sequence? Human?

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 02 Apr 2008 #permalink

It is E.coli... Figures...