1. #1 talking snake
    February 28, 2009

    Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end?

  2. #2 Yanni
    February 28, 2009

    As a grad at Stony Brook, always a pleasure to hear Massimo Pigliucci.

  3. #3 Wayne Robinson
    February 28, 2009

    I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily.

  4. #4 386sx
    March 1, 2009

    The only “controversy” I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design “argument by analogy” is becoming. Very very controversial.

    Scientist says some science stuff…

    IDer says some lame analogy stuff..

    More science stuff from the scientist…

    More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist…

  5. #5 Hank
    March 1, 2009

    386sx: Pigliucci has a great way of cutting through the bullshit.

  6. #6 Mr_Man
    March 6, 2009

    Here’s a clearer copy from the makers of the show.
    MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design