Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end?
As a grad at Stony Brook, always a pleasure to hear Massimo Pigliucci.
I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily.
The only “controversy” I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design “argument by analogy” is becoming. Very very controversial.
Scientist says some science stuff…
IDer says some lame analogy stuff..
More science stuff from the scientist…
More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist…
386sx: Pigliucci has a great way of cutting through the bullshit.
Here’s a clearer copy from the makers of the show.
MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design
Current ye@r *
Leave this field empty
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
Notify me of followup comments via E-Mail.