By gregladen on February 28, 2009. Tags Creation Science creationism darwin Evolutionary Biology Intelligent Design religion Log in to post comments More like this Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end? Log in to post comments As a grad at Stony Brook, always a pleasure to hear Massimo Pigliucci. Log in to post comments I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily. Log in to post comments The only "controversy" I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design "argument by analogy" is becoming. Very very controversial. Scientist says some science stuff... IDer says some lame analogy stuff.. More science stuff from the scientist... More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist... Log in to post comments 386sx: Pigliucci has a great way of cutting through the bullshit. Log in to post comments Here's a clearer copy from the makers of the show.MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design Log in to post comments
Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end? Log in to post comments
I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily. Log in to post comments
The only "controversy" I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design "argument by analogy" is becoming. Very very controversial. Scientist says some science stuff... IDer says some lame analogy stuff.. More science stuff from the scientist... More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist... Log in to post comments
Here's a clearer copy from the makers of the show.MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design Log in to post comments
Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end?
As a grad at Stony Brook, always a pleasure to hear Massimo Pigliucci.
I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily.
The only "controversy" I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design "argument by analogy" is becoming. Very very controversial.
Scientist says some science stuff...
IDer says some lame analogy stuff..
More science stuff from the scientist...
More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist...
386sx: Pigliucci has a great way of cutting through the bullshit.
Here's a clearer copy from the makers of the show.
MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design