For Kitty’s Beeach

A cute puppy:


  1. #1 dominich
    April 7, 2009

    Cute in the same way that the airbrushed models on magazine covers are beautiful.

  2. #2 Kitty'sBitch
    April 7, 2009

    Thanks Greg, I needed that.

  3. #3 Spiv
    April 7, 2009

    Don’t kid yourself guys: everyone knows atheists don’t have feelings and are therefore unable to distinguish cute from evil. Nice try, Mr. Laden. We’re on to you.

  4. #4 ppnl
    April 7, 2009

    I’m guessing the head has been made larger, the eyes are made larger and the features of the face have been softened. Cuteness is a biological response.

  5. #5 llewelly
    April 7, 2009

    Wow. That is the ugliest puppy I have ever seen. Poor thing.

    It looks like some deranged photoshopist hybridized a cat and a dog.

  6. #6 Rob W
    April 7, 2009

    @ppnl — you think this was photoshopped? Go out and see some real puppies; they are *crazy* cute. The “cute-response” features are incredibly exaggerated. Why go to the work of photoshopping when all you need is a camera and a bunch of puppies? See or somesuch for examples of amateur photos.

    Human newborns have nothing on most animals’ little ones.

  7. #7 Tom L
    April 7, 2009

    It is two things, chiefly:
    1) The angle of the eye causes the white to show, which ever so slightly anthropomorphizes they expression in the eyes;
    2) The dark smear on the muzzle (which may or may not have been digitally added), clearly mimicking a smile.

    (atheist scientist mode off)

    That, and it’s a cuddly, soft, fuzzy widdle baby. Awwwwwww… 🙂