Pharyngula

This link is NSFW or for anyone who knows anything about octopus anatomy—it’s a couple of nudes with dangerously draped octopuses. I don’t mind the nudity but I cringe inside at the thought of where those beaks are.

Comments

  1. #1 Great White Wonder
    November 13, 2007

    Octopi love to eat crabs.

  2. #2 Bride of Shrek
    November 13, 2007

    What’s up with the flesh coloured training bra the bloke seems to have on? I find that more disturbing than the octopus undies.

    Just proved there’s a fetish out there for everyone. If you don’t believe me just google “booger fetish”.

  3. #3 G
    November 13, 2007

    @#1

    Well, now I know what it feels like to clean my sinuses with coke.

    Thank you so much.

  4. #4 Grewgills
    November 13, 2007

    His does seem dangerously placed. Hers seems to be missing most of its head in or under, but the beak is not dangerously positioned.

  5. #5 Brownian, OM
    November 13, 2007

    I guess I’ll find out now whether pictures of boobs are going to set off the IT people in my organisation.

    But where’s W00t when you need him?

  6. #6 Bride of Shrek
    November 13, 2007

    Oh boy, just had a look around the rest of that site. I’m not sure what’s more disgusting, the use of semen as “art” or the “pornscapes” page which demonstrates that, even in artistic porn,there is a case to be had for photoshopping out the odd errant haemerrhoid. Uuuurrgghhh.

  7. #7 Jsn
    November 13, 2007

    So they’re using octopusses as crotch covers – OK, HOLD THE PRESSES. Did anyone notice the really strange thing? The dude is wearing a MANKINI top.
    Any fans of “The Soup” will love this.

  8. #8 Siamang
    November 13, 2007

    “If you can think of it, there’s sex of it on the internet.”

  9. #9 True Bob
    November 13, 2007

    I thought that was a “Mansierre”.

  10. #10 Randall
    November 13, 2007

    Am I the only one reminded of this classic woodcut print from Japan?

  11. #11 gorobei
    November 13, 2007

    Damnit. I will shoot the next person using the non-word “octopi.”

  12. #12 Sven DiMilo
    November 13, 2007

    No, Randall, I doubt you are the only one.

    And hey–was that Elvira? No, no–the woman, I mean.

  13. #13 Arren Frank
    November 13, 2007
    @ True Bob [#9]

    …..It’s a bro!

  14. #14 denise
    November 13, 2007

    you know, it’s not the octopus near the private parts that freaks me out. It is the DEAD FISH that happens to be an octopus near the private parts that gives me the screaming willies!

  15. #15 octopod
    November 13, 2007

    The lady in the second photo, at least, has her octopus beak-side-up. Slightly less alarming, I suppose.

  16. #16 Kenneth McFarlane
    November 13, 2007

    I agree that the most disturbing part of these photos is the ‘dead fish on crotch’ part.
    In the photo with the girl you can even see what seems to be the bag that they pulled to octopus out of, on the floor beside the table. Either that or it is the largest discarded condom ever.

  17. #17 rhian
    November 13, 2007

    I love the comment at the bottom:
    “MacchÚ “polipi”, quelli son polpi. Ignorantone.”

    It makes me weirdly happy to know that even in Italy, and even in the face of octopus bikinis, people obnoxiously correct each other’s spelling on the internet. It’s a nice universal theme.

  18. #18 Russell Blackford
    November 13, 2007

    I know it can be irritating that some people think the plural is “octopi”, but getting the message out that it’s really “octopodes” is really difficult.

  19. #19 Russell
    November 13, 2007

    You mean… it’s not octopussies?
    ;-)

  20. #20 Russell
    November 13, 2007
  21. #21 mayhempix
    November 13, 2007

    Cephalopod sex sucks.

    Errr… bites.

    It’s a head foot squirt fetish thing.

  22. #22 SMC
    November 13, 2007

    I prefer “octopodes”, myself…

  23. #23 Doug
    November 13, 2007

    Just proved there’s a fetish out there for everyone. If you don’t believe me just google “booger fetish”.

    Disgusting! That’s a phrase that should have remained a googlenope.

  24. #24 Tulse
    November 13, 2007
  25. #25 Hexatron
    November 14, 2007

    Elvira? Not even close.

  26. #26 f
    November 14, 2007

    Bride of Shrek: Neither all the money in the world, nor a gun to my head could ever get me to google “booger fetish.”

  27. #27 RedMolly
    November 14, 2007

    Octo-dude looks like Jim Carrey. Which is almost as disturbing as his flesh-colored training bra.

    Sadly, the “anticlericale” section was 100% cephalopod-free. I was sort of looking forward to a monsignor-squid mashup.

  28. #28 Pole Greaser
    November 14, 2007

    Another example of how the religion of evolutionism promotes beastiality!

  29. #29 fcaccin
    November 14, 2007

    “MacchÚ “polipi”, quelli son polpi. Ignorantone.”

    In Italian “polipi” (plural of “polipo”) refers to Cnidarians or to a tumoral tissue growth. That is, nothing to do with “polpi” (octopuses).
    Sadly, even dictionaries are being updated so: a sure sign that accuracy is no more fashionable.
    BTW, the blog title reads:

    Annoyance
    I hate blogs, they are the shit of the net

    Pyre’s comment (the second) is “where are the octopuses’ beaks?

  30. #30 Nemo
    November 14, 2007

    #14, #16: An octopus is not a fish. Damnit.

  31. #31 daenku32
    November 14, 2007

    Sorry, my wife doesn’t allow me look at NSFW stuff.

  32. #32 stogoe
    November 14, 2007

    The dude is wearing a MANKINI top.

    I love The Soup. I get all my necessary (and also all my completely unneccesary) entertainment news from Joel McHale, and I’m a better person for it.

  33. #33 Azkyroth
    November 16, 2007

    Sorry, my wife doesn’t allow me look at NSFW stuff.

    Please tell me you’re joking.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.