Astronomers Push The Limits Of Hubble (Synopsis)

"The wonder is, not that the field of stars of so vast, but that man has measured it." -Anatole France

If you could gather 250 million times as much light as your eye, and improve your resolution by several orders of magnitude, you just might be able to see what the Hubble Space Telescope can. By extending down into the near-infrared, and combining those observations with that from other great observatories like Chandra and Spitzer, we can probe the star-formation history of the Universe.

Image credit: NASA, ESA, the GOODS Team and M. Giavalisco (STScI/University of Massachusetts), of a region of the GOODS field with a large number of dwarf galaxies, an important contributor to star formation. Image credit: NASA, ESA, the GOODS Team and M. Giavalisco (STScI/University of Massachusetts), of a region of the GOODS field with a large number of dwarf galaxies, an important contributor to star formation.

Thanks to NASA’s GOODS and CANDELS programs, we’ve been able to determine when the Universe becomes reionized, when star formation peaks and how it declines up through the present day.

Image credit: NASA, ESA, A. van der Wel (Max Planck Institute for Astronomy), H. Ferguson and A. Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute), and the CANDELS team, of a region containing 18 galaxies forming stars so quickly that the number of stars inside will double in just 10 million years: just 0.1% the lifetime of the Universe. Image credit: NASA, ESA, A. van der Wel (Max Planck Institute for Astronomy), H. Ferguson and A. Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute), and the CANDELS team, of a region containing 18 galaxies forming stars so quickly that the number of stars inside will double in just 10 million years: just 0.1% the lifetime of the Universe.

Go read the whole piece in no more than 200 words and a glorious set of pictures on today’s Mostly Mute Monday!

More like this

"For the first time we can learn about individual stars from near the beginning of time. There are surely many more out there." -Neil Gehrels We’ve come incredibly far in our quest to learn how the Universe came to be the way it is today. We can see out in space for tens of billions of light years…
“Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before.” -Edgar Allan Poe No matter where you look in the night sky, a powerful enough telescope appears to reveal points of light. Even if you find a region with no…
"Modern man must descend the spiral of his own absurdity to the lowest point; only then can he look beyond it." -Vaclav Havel But the spiral is more than a metaphor or a mathematical shape, it's also the most common feature observed in the galaxies out there in the Universe. There are 27 spiral…
“The wonder is, not that the field of the stars is so vast, but that man has measured it.” -Anatole France Wherever large, dense collections of cool gas gather together under the force of their own gravity, new stars are bound to form. Every galaxy goes through peaks and lulls in star formation,…

Hi Ethan,

the Forbes doesn't seem to have their annoying welcome screen anymore so that's nice :) can again read your posts.

But have some questions about this post. The title suggests that GOODS is something that is happening right now... that right now hubble is being pushed to it's limits. Yet the published paper on GOODS (The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results From Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging).. available on Arxiv..is from 2003... more than a decade ago. In it they say that all HST observations for GOODS are completed and available. So my question is if it's happening now, or has happened in 2003?

Second one is your description for the last photo in Forbes.. you say it's hubble with EST, yet the source on wiki as well as ESA's website ( http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1013/ ) don't mention HST anywhere in contributing to that photo. It seems to be entirely done using VLT. This seems to go in line with GOODS paper on arxiv which says that Hubble covered the northern field, while chandra and others covered the south field.. ESO being the southern observatory. So question two is does hubble have anything to do with last image?

By Sinisa Lazarek (not verified) on 22 Feb 2016 #permalink

Every time a read an article like this that talks about peaks and decline, there is always a little part in the back of my brain that thinks for a moment 'star formation peaked 10 billion years ago and we're running out of the stuff to make new ones? WTF are we going to do?'