P.O. Box 98199
Washington, DC 20090-8199
800-647-5463
Lat/Lon: 38.90531943278526, -77.0376992225647
Is a photo essay I bought years ago and rarely looked at. I was going to get rid of it, but then flicking through I came across this wonderful picture.
It looks like some bizarre sci-fi drawing, but is in fact a prototype nuclear-powered jet engine. Read more about it at nuclearfiles.org, which has the full set of piccies from the book, but I think I got the exposure better on mine.
Wow, the West was pretty rich at that times… I thought it was a 18th century train wagon.
In what way is a nuclear powered jet engine on a train not bizarre sci-fi? I mean, aside from the fact that it was actually real? It’s right up there with radium health tonics…
[Weeeeelllll it was a serious project, they spent an entirely non-fictional $1B on it, and even flew the reactor in a plane (though not for power) -W]
The technology and politics of aircraft nuclear propulsion.
Interesting. However, I can find no mention of what is probably the single most important factor in aircraft engine design – power to weight ratio. Plus there’s the interesting question of what happens if you fly it into a mountain…
They spent a stupid amount of money on remote viewing too.
Perhaps that was what they were going to spend the second billion dollars on! :-)
“Plus there’s the interesting question of what happens if you fly it into a mountain…”
They probably assumed it would be a Soviet mountain. Maybe they hoped that would happen, in a sort of cross between Dr Strangelove & “Fade Out”?
(Fade Out is a novel by Patrick Tilley).
Oooh, that is a bit of a beastie! Whatever’s the point of such an engine though? It hardly looks like the most economical of propulsion systems!
A former boss of mine worked on such projects for GE in the 60s. The goal was to build a plane that never had to land.
Interesting. However, I can find no mention of what is probably the single most important factor in aircraft engine design – power to weight ratio.
The weight of the reactor may have been solvable. The mass of the shielding was not.