Is a photo essay I bought years ago and rarely looked at. I was going to get rid of it, but then flicking through I came across this wonderful picture.
It looks like some bizarre sci-fi drawing, but is in fact a prototype nuclear-powered jet engine. Read more about it at nuclearfiles.org, which has the full set of piccies from the book, but I think I got the exposure better on mine.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Well, I read it, so I may as well blog it. If that sounds unenthusiastic, then yes, I am. It is a book, in case you haven't realised; inevitably it has a wiki page so I won't summarise it here or even tell you the author. It gets less and less plausible as it goes along, though is fun enough in a…
Everyone else blogs about what they've read (everyone? Well, this is a blog, who cares about accuracy. Bryan does and I'm sure other people do to). And I happen to notice that my queue of books-I've-finished-reading looks quite good just now. Once upon a time (well, since my teens up to only a few…
This was the first of several book-related memes I did, back on April 05, 2005. Follow the responses of people I tagged as well. And if you have not done this version yet, and you like the questions, then feel tagged and post your answers on your blog...
I was afraid this was going to happen. I…
In case you didn't know, reality is science fiction.
If you doubt me, read the news. Read, for example, this recent article in the New York Times about Carnegie Mellon's "Read the Web" program, in which a computer system called NELL (Never Ending Language Learner) is systematically reading the…
Wow, the West was pretty rich at that times... I thought it was a 18th century train wagon.
In what way is a nuclear powered jet engine on a train not bizarre sci-fi? I mean, aside from the fact that it was actually real? It's right up there with radium health tonics...
[Weeeeelllll it was a serious project, they spent an entirely non-fictional $1B on it, and even flew the reactor in a plane (though not for power) -W]
The technology and politics of aircraft nuclear propulsion.
Interesting. However, I can find no mention of what is probably the single most important factor in aircraft engine design - power to weight ratio. Plus there's the interesting question of what happens if you fly it into a mountain...
They spent a stupid amount of money on remote viewing too.
Perhaps that was what they were going to spend the second billion dollars on! :-)
"Plus there's the interesting question of what happens if you fly it into a mountain..."
They probably assumed it would be a Soviet mountain. Maybe they hoped that would happen, in a sort of cross between Dr Strangelove & "Fade Out"?
(Fade Out is a novel by Patrick Tilley).
Oooh, that is a bit of a beastie! Whatever's the point of such an engine though? It hardly looks like the most economical of propulsion systems!
A former boss of mine worked on such projects for GE in the 60s. The goal was to build a plane that never had to land.
Interesting. However, I can find no mention of what is probably the single most important factor in aircraft engine design - power to weight ratio.
The weight of the reactor may have been solvable. The mass of the shielding was not.