"It would be as if any discussion of intercontinental navigation required a preliminary discussion of why the evidence shows that the earth is not flat"

I've been ranting lately about how I don't like the term "risk aversion," and I was thinking it might help to bring up this post from last year:

This discussion from Keynes (from Robert Skidelsky, linked from Steve Hsu) reminds me of a frustrating conversation I've sometimes had with economists regarding the concept of "risk aversion."

Risk aversion means many things, but in particular it is associated with attiitudes such as preferring a certain $30 to a 50/50 chance of having either $20 or $40. The standard model for this set of attitudes is to assume a nonlinear function for money. It is well known that reasonable nonlinear utility functions do not explain this sort of $20/30/40 attitude (see section 5 of this little article, for example); nonetheless the curving utility function always comes up in discussion, requiring me to waste a few minutes before going on, explaining why it doesn't explain the phenomenon.

It would be as if any discussion of intercontinental navigation required a preliminary discussion of why the evidence shows that the earth is not flat. . . .

More like this

The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs:
THE humble fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) has the ability to learn and remember, and to make predictions about the outcome of its behaviours on the basis of past experience.
So Harry Reid announced that the Iraq war is lost, that there is no military solution to the crisis.
There are 12 new articles in PLoS ONE today.