Two Views of Richat Structure

The Richat Structure is not a structure in the usual sense.
 It is a natural feature located in the Sahara Desert of
Mauritania.  It is unusual because it is nearly circular.
 It was href="">first
observed from space, in 1965, by the astronauts James A.
McDivitt and Edward H. White.  (Irrelevant comment: both
McDivitt and White attended the University of Michigan, and there is a href="">plaza,
near the diag, named for them.)

At first, href="">the
Richat Structure was thought to have been formed by a meteor
impact.  Upon further review, it was found to not have the
features of such an impact.  Consequently, it now is thought
to be a circular anticline.  It consists of Paleozoic
quartzites. Erosion removed the sand, but the quartzite is much more
resistant to erosion.

As depicted on Nasa's Earth Observatory site:


This true-color scene was acquired by the
Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), flying aboard
NASA’s Terra satellite, on March 11, 2002.

This is the sort of image we are accustomed to seeing.  Now
there is one that is more interesting, posted on Wikipedia.
 (Below the fold, of course...)


In order to fully appreciate it, you might want to href="">see
high resolution version (2259x1244, 495 KB).  Part
of the image was taken during the href="">Shuttle Radar
Topography Mission, and part is a Landsat image; the two were
combined,as described on the href="">JPL

This view was generated from a Landsat satellite
image draped over an elevation model produced by the Shuttle Radar
Topography Mission (SRTM). The view uses a 6-times vertical
exaggeration to greatly enhance topographic expression. For vertical
scale, note that the height of the mesa ridge in the back center of the
view is about 285 meters (about 935 feet) tall. Colors of the scene
were enhanced by use of a combination of visible and infrared bands,
which helps to differentiate bedrock (browns), sand (yellow, some
white), minor vegetation in drainage channels (green), and salty
sediments (bluish whites). Some shading of the elevation model was
included to further highlight the topographic features.

In other words, the Structure does not really look like the picture.  But
it sure is a nice image.  I don't think it is frivolous, even
though it is not a literal depiction of the Structure.  It
shows what kinds of things can be done with this kind of imaging, to
enhance the pictures.  This can have href="">practical
applications, in addition to making pretty pictures.

More like this

From a NASA Press Release: NASA and Japan released a new digital topographic map of Earth Monday that covers more of our planet than ever before. The map was produced with detailed measurements from NASA's Terra spacecraft. The new global digital elevation model of Earth was created from nearly…
It's good to see NASA hasn't completely abandoned its mandate to look after the home planet. As its Earth Observatory notes: Among the casualties of the conflict between Lebanon and Israel in the summer of 2006 was the Mediterranean. Israeli raids in mid-July on the Jiyyeh Power Station released…
“The world communicates subtly. Most people don't hear or see the signs because they're so wrapped up in their day-to-day lives.” -Doug Cooper If you wanted to see if a planet was inhabited in Star Trek, all you had to do was scan for signs of life. With current technology, that's really hard to do…
Did you ever look at Google's digital Earth model and notice something missing? Like 70% of Earth's topography, for instance? The seafloor shown there is a kind of "shadow topography". It's satellite derived. Fortunately for us, everything in Google Earth with an elevation less than zero is about…