Georgia Evolution Update

Georgia school boss Kathy Cox has backed off her announced plan to remove the word "evolution" from the state academic standards. Paul Myers speculates that the whole thing could very well have just been a cover-up for the fact that the new proposed standards water down the teaching of evolution enormously, regardless of whether the word is used. I agree with him. It's about the only explanation that makes any sense out of the whole sordid bunch of nonsense.

Think about it. She announces at a press conference that she's going to remove the word "evolution" from the school standards because it's a controversial "buzzword" that attracts too much attention in "socially conservative areas", but don't worry because the substance is all still there. As it turned out, however, hardly a word of that is true. Cox herself IS one of those "social conservatives" who wants to weaken the teaching of evolution and her standards DID water down that teaching, as Reed Cartwright's analysis of the new standards makes clear. The proposed Georgia standards purport to be based upon the American Association for the Advancement of Science model standards for science education, but they have removed several components of them. And Kathy Cox has previously said that the new standards would allow the teaching of "intelligent design" alongside evolution, which if true would not be changed simply by dropping the petty argument over whether to use the word "evolution" or not.

And then there is the obvious lie that she was doing this to "avoid controversy". A word of advice, Kathy...you don't "avoid controversy" by calling a press conference to announce that you want to avoid controversy. So there are really two choices. Either Kathy Cox is astonishingly stupid, or this was all a ruse. Make a big controversial statement on a surface issue, then back off of it, and maybe no one will look behind the curtain and see what the actual standards are.

Most of the media in Georgia will probably be fooled, but not the folks who are working to insure that science education in Georgia doesn't get diminished. I got to meet a couple of the board members of Georgia Citizens for Integrity in Science Education at a conference at Berkeley last May, and I've been priveleged to work with Genie Scott and the good people from the National Center for Science Education for years. They aren't going to be fooled by this cheap little diversion and they will continue to push for the highest standards of quality science education, in Georgia and around the country.

Tags

More like this

Please welcome Reed Cartwright's De Rerum Natura to the blogosphere. Reed is currently finishing his PhD in genetics at the University of Georgia and is involved with the Georgia Citizens for Integrity in Science Education. A few weeks ago I cited his analysis of the proposed Georgia science…
Georgia wants to ban the word "evolution" from science classes, replacing it instead with "biological changes over time". The superintendant of schools, Kathy Cox, claims that she wants to do this because the word "evolution" has become such a controversial buzzword that perhaps replacing the term…
Reed Cartwright of the University of Georgia has done a thorough analysis of the proposed Georgia science standards. It shows, in brief, that Kathy Cox is lying when she says that the new standards would teach the concept of evolution without using the word. Of course, I think everyone knew that…
As Josh Rosenau reported yesterday, the latest attempt by the ID crowd to get their ideas into science classrooms in Ohio by hook or by crook was tabled at a state Board of Education subcommittee hearing. The meeting ran out of time before a measure sponsored by Deborah Owens Fink, which would…