Timothy Sandefur has a report on the decision at the Panda's Thumb. And CE Petit has a post about it as well. Both seem to think that it's a pretty solid decision.
You can also access the amicus curiae brief that was written by Sandefur on behalf of Michigan Citizens for Science and seven other state science organizations here.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I thought I'd post what some legal scholars are saying about yesterday's ruling, since a good many of them have blogs and have responded. First, Timothy Sandefur writes at the Panda's Thumb:
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District is a major victory for science and a major blow to those who have…
Yesterday I thanked Timothy Sandefur for his hard work on the brief filed by a collection of state science organizations, which was cited by the judge twice in yesterday's ruling striking down the Cobb County disclaimer. I should also have included Reed Cartwright in that. Reed was the one, along…
I mentioned the brief filed by 85 scientists asking the judge not to rule on the question of what is and is not science, a brief written by DI fellow David DeWolf. Over on the Panda's Thumb, Timothy Sandefur has written a blistering critique of the dishonest rhetoric found in that brief. Also pay…
Timothy Sandefur has an excellent post at the Panda's Thumb fisking Frank Beckwith's article in Legal Times concerning the Cobb County decision. The crux of Beckwith's argument is that the ruling "presents a Catch-22 that makes it nearly impossible for religious citizens to remedy public policies…