Watching Friends on TV

No, not the sitcom. A couple hours ago I was flipping channels and I see my friend Nick Matzke on the screen. Nick works for the National Center for Science Education and is a contributor to the Panda's Thumb. I had the good fortune to meet him a couple years ago at a conference at Berkeley (and the misfortune of trying to shove three of us into the front of his tiny pickup for a ride back to the hotel after eating an enormous dinner). He was on Fox News being interviewed by Tony Snow, along with Stephen Meyer of the Discovery Institute. I only caught the last minute of it, but enough to see Nick hold up a copy of Of Pandas and People, the ID textbook that was approved as a supplemental text in Dover, now the subject of a Federal lawsuit, and was being used as well in the Gull Lake situation here in Michigan. As Nick pointed out, this textbook actually serves as powerful evidence for the argument that Intelligent Design is just creationism in a new package because, in the initial drafts of the book they actually used the terms "creationism" and "creation science"; those terms were simply replaced in numerous places with "intelligent design". Given that the Supreme Court has already ruled creationism out of public schools, this is an important argument in the Dover lawsuit.

More like this

Jon Buell, the head of the Foundation for Thought and Ethics and publisher of the book Of Pandas and People (Pandas), has written a long essay criticizing Judge Jones' ruling in the Dover case. That's hardly a surprise, of course. The judge ruled against his position, how could he do anything but…
The blogosphere is structured like a bus of tourists heading into ever new territory being spoken to by a thousand guides with microphones in the front of the vehicle. Woe be it to any guide who points out something that the bus passed several blocks back. But sometimes it is appropriate to re-…
In reading Barbara Forrest's testimony, it quickly becomes clear why the defense has objected so vociferously to her being allowed to testify as an expert witness. On the issues that are really at the core of this case, she is the witness who does the most damage to the arguments of the defense.…
The most important issue in the Dover case is whether "intelligent design" is a genuine scientific theory or whether it is just old-fashioned creationism given a new label - old wine in new skins, to use a Biblical metaphor. Here's powerful evidence for the plaintiffs, presented by their attorney…