How low can Detroit go?

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has released a radio ad designed to play on soccer mom's fears about road safety, dishonestly arguing that Congressional attempts to increase fuel mileage will make safe cars too expensive to afford. This despite the fact that SUVs tend to be more dangerous -- to both drivers and others -- than smaller vehicles. The New Scientist Environment blog has the details, the ad, and facts, including this graph illustrating the relative risk of a variety of cars and SUVs:


Click on the graph for a full-size version. And then consider the foolishness of a full-size SUV. Their owners are not only wasting money and gas, they're making the roads more dangerous for themselves, their children and everyone else. Of course, all this was known years ago. In his 2002 book High and Mighty: SUVs--The World's Most Dangerous Vehicles and How They Got That Way, former Detroit NYT correspondent Keith Bradsher laid all this out. Since then the safety concerns of large SUVs only become more clear. Any parent who still thinks SUVs are a good idea needs a wakeup call.

If I was a radio station manager, I'd take the Alliance's money, and be sure to run a disclaimer noting the implication that SUVs are safer than more efficient cars is an outright lie.

Tags

More like this

In response to my blog yesterday about America's continued love affair with horsepower and V8 engines, I recieved an excellent comment. It's worth a read: If you ask people why they drive 4WD SUVs you get a number of answers, usually associated with safety, or power and control. While many early…
A while ago, I stumbled across this amazing article about a car mechanic, who never even graduated high school, and who has developed a diesel engine that is cleaner (biodiesel based), more fuel efficient, and more powerful than the standard engine produced by car companies (italics mine): This is…
Hybrid vehicles clearly have better gas mileage than many SUVs on the market, but does the gas mileage as a figure accurately represent the total energy usage required to build, market, use and destroy the vehicle? Art Spinella, in a huge study by CNW Marketing Research, has endeavored to find the…
Via a mailing list, Reason magazine has an article claiming that SUV's are better for the environment than hybrid cars: Spinella spent two years on the most comprehensive study to date - dubbed "Dust to Dust" -- collecting data on the energy necessary to plan, build, sell, drive and dispose of a…