1. pharyngula
  2. Conservapædia must have a stiffy for me

Conservapædia must have a stiffy for me

By pharyngula on August 17, 2010.

Just the other week, Conservapædia made their page on PZ Myers their featured article for the week; now they've made the Pharyngula blog a target of their cranky ire. Here's their description:

Myers' blog is also listed by the science journal Nature, which also embraces evolutionary pseudoscience, as the best blog by a scientist. Pharyngula is known for its sarcastic and often specious criticism of creation science and intelligent design theory,[3][4] as well as regular postings of photos of cephalopods (often with vulgarly sexual connotations both subtle and blatant).

Isn't it charming that they lump Nature and a mere blog as similar? I do appreciate that they noticed "subtle and blatant" vulgar sexual connotations about cephalopods — I'm going to have to offend them even more in the future, thanks to their encouragement.

(Remember, we have spam filters in place because Conservapædians tend to go nuttily excessive in their whining; don't link directly to the site, and always name it as "Conservapædia" to avoid the filters.)

Tags
creationism
Kooks

More like this

Relativity = relativism
That darn English language that makes words with different meanings sometimes sound similar — it always ends up confusing Christian conservatives of very little brain, whose depth of understanding can only be measured in micrometers. The latest from Conservapædia is that they are on a crusade…
Shakin’ the nuts
Stay tuned for frolicsome hijinks and high hilarity. We have stirred up some kooks. Here are 3 in ascending order of lunacy. That climate fraud, Anthony Watts, has noticed Pepsigate. He's got a unique spin on it: the reason some Sciencebloggers were very upset at the inclusion of an unlabeled…
Fat Christians are a lie!
How can our news media get the story so completely backwards? MSNBC is reporting a correlation between religiosity and obesity, which simply can't be true. Aside from the difficulties of going from a correlation between two complex phenemona to an assumption of causality, we have it from an…
Conservapædia has a new project
The far right wing has long rested their authority on Biblical truth — how can you possibly question them if they speak for God, after all? There is one little problem, however. The Bible is suffused with liberal bias. A lot of the Old Testament isn't bad, but the New Testament, when Jesus makes…