Never trust the anti-woman brigade to be honest

They are as bad as creationists. They often are creationists. Their anti-abortion ideology is so overwhelming that they will make up 'facts' and call them science. Here's a recent example:

"I think it's important to note with the term fertilized egg, that's the same thing as using the N word for an African American," said Mason. "Because it's a dehumanizing term and it's not based in science. The term would be a zygote, or an embryo, speaking of a unique individual." Mason is hoping the passage of the amendment will lead to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

"It's a bad law," said Mason, referring to Roe v. Wade. "It was not based in reason. They ignored the concept of the pre-born child being a person."

That's simply insane. You aren't insulting a fertilized egg by referring to its status, and there is no one there to be insulted by your terminology. This Keith Mason wanker has no qualifications as a scientist — he seems to be little more than a self-appointed minister…which explains his propensity for lying.

We use the term "fertilized egg" all the time — so do farmers and grocers. I could show it to you in developmental biology textbooks.

While we use the term "fertilized egg" routinely, there is another term you won't find in any of the texts or on the lips of developmental biologists: "pre-born child". What a crock.

More like this

Stuart Taylor has an interesting article on Supreme Court predictions in the National Journal. He doesn't see a dramatic shift rightward happening: Abortion. The Roberts Court has already voted in a big abortion case, on the constitutionality of the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.…
Speaking of flip-flopping, it appears that the rethuglicans hold the World Record for flip-flopping. For example, Senator McCain -- I am still waiting for him to fulfill his promise to the American people by committing suicide -- has recently flip-flopped on his position regarding abortion rights.…
On this Blogging for Choice Day, we are asked to tell why we are pro-choice. For me, the answer is simple: women are people, and as such deserve to have control of their own bodies. Like Lindsay, I find this claim remarkable only in that others find it remarkable. That's why I'm pro-choice, and…
Thereâs lots of good blogging this week about what our elected (and hoping to be elected) leaders are doing â or at least talking about doing â on climate change: David Roberts at Gristmill thinks itâs better to hold out for better federal climate legislation in 2009 Jonathan Pfeiffer at Science…