For a moment there, I was worried. Here I was, putting the readership to work writing a best seller based on the magic power of pope guts, and then Charles Stross, a real writer, writes up his own treatment based on the same premise. Fortunately, he has also announced he will not write it.
But man, while the principled writers with standards are going to turn up their nose at this, you know every contemptible hack who scribbles up potboilers for sale in airport bookstores is pouncing on the idea right now. Write faster, people! We have to be more contemptible and more hackish if I'm going to exploit this market opportunity!
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The Hugo Award Nominees for 2007 have been officially announced. The one award I usually watch closely is Best Novel, and this year's nominees are:
Eifelheim, Michael Flynn (Tor)
His Majesty's Dragon, Naomi Novik (Del Rey)
Glasshouse, Charles Stross (Ace)
Rainbows End, Vernor Vinge (Tor)…
Hey, hack journalists, have I got a great concept for you! As I'm sure you're aware, editors and the public are constantly hassling you to write about this discovery or that, and it gets tiresome: you don't really know the first thing about the subject, you certainly don't know anything about the…
Checking In on Old Friends
As long-time readers of this blog know, there are a few crackpots who I've written about multiple
times. Those nutters have their fans, and people seem to want to hear about what they're up to. So today, I'll give you a brief look at what's going on with the three fan…
One of the by-products of the brouhaha (here, here) over The Atlantic article on vaccines was some interesting issues raised by the way the Knight Science Journalism Tracker handled it (here, here). If you aren't familiar with KSJ Tracker, it's a site that does "peer review" of science journalism.…