Somebody tell them…Dickens' London was not a utopia

Jane Cunningham, a Rethuglican (of course), has sponsored a bill in the Missouri congress that will disillusion you a little further today. Behold, SB 222!

This act modifies the child labor laws. It eliminates the prohibition on employment of children under age fourteen. Restrictions on the number of hours and restrictions on when a child may work during the day are also removed. It also repeals the requirement that a child ages fourteen or fifteen obtain a work certificate or work permit in order to be employed. Children under sixteen will also be allowed to work in any capacity in a motel, resort or hotel where sleeping accommodations are furnished. It also removes the authority of the director of the Division of Labor Standards to inspect employers who employ children and to require them to keep certain records for children they employ. It also repeals the presumption that the presence of a child in a workplace is evidence of employment.

OK, that's enough. I'm not reading any more email this morning. Instead, I think I'll zip down to the liquor store and pick up a gallon jug of rum and curl up in a corner, weeping.

Damn, no. We're in the middle of a storm with 35-50 mph winds howling outside. I guess I'm just going to have to face this universe sober.

Tags

More like this

What do Kraft Foods Global, Tyson Foods, Sea World and Lucas Oil Production Studio have in common? They are four of the 147 employers identified by OSHA as "severe violators" of worker health and safety standards.
There are some things to be said for staring at scatterplots and times series plots Calculated Risk, in case you hadn't heard, is one of the best economics and finance blogs on the Net.
In my post yesterday "OSHA issues PPE rule: what took'em so long?" I forgot to mention that OSHA is giving employers six months to comply with it.  Recall that
...but these are green shoots merely "bumps in the road." Or something.