Here is an article at physorg.com about a result in quantum computing (see here for my own article on this result.) And here is an article on the website fudzilla describing this physorg result. How in the world do you get from the physorg article to fudzillas: "Top boffins who have been looking under the bonnet of Quantum computers are starting to think that they may not be the future of computing"?
Is the internet version of the game telephone more or less noisy than the spoken game?
Categories
- Log in to post comments
More like this
In which I steal an analogy from Joe Emerson to explain the limits of quantum computing.
------------
As previously noted, a couple of weeks ago I went to Canada for the opening of the University of Waterloo's new Quantum Nano Center (their photo gallery includes one picture of me being interviewed…
Even though I know this isn't really funny at all. In fact, it is quite tragic.
Over recent years, several states have enacted drop-off laws, allowing parents (=mothers) to drop off their unwanted children (=babies). Forever. Some of the impetus for this kind of law is to promote lousy sexual…
The National Oral History - Grantland
"The National Sports Daily, on the one hand, is a long-dead and short-lived newspaper that, for 18 months, between January of 1990 and June of 1991, attempted to cover sports in a way that no other American publication would, could, or had ever even imagined.…
The 10K birds Just For Fun Avian ID Quiz!
Videos of developmental trajectories in cortical thickening
Japan harnesses commuters' stamping for power from PhysOrg.com
Japan has found a way to harness clean energy from thousands of stamping feet that pass through one of its busiest train stations…