The Seed Overlords Will Be Happy

I am not doing this because the Seed Overlords will be happy -- even though they probably will be. I am doing it because I think it will help you out. I wanted to plug a link that our happy friends over at Seed have. At the end of every week Seed publishes a "Week in Science" summary that I find exceptionally helpful. It is a short summary of whatever happened that week -- sort of a Kiplinger letter, only for science. If you don't have a lot of time but you still want to know what is going on, I highly recommend it. Anyway, here it is.

More like this

Over at the new Seed blog, here on ScienceBlogs, Katherine Sharpe asks about the best science books ever (a topic that was also discussed at Cosmic Variance some time back. I've been sort of swamped this week, but that's only part of the reason why I haven't responded. The main reason is a shameful…
I occasionally put up some of the wackier/more obnoxious e-mail I get from creationists and other deluded True Believers, but I don't want to give the wrong impression—I also get lots of friendly and supportive email. I just don't think any of it is quite as entertaining as the crazy stuff. Anyway…
Just a day into the New Year I was feeling feisty and issued a challenge to readers and the Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) blogosphere in general. I asked for a critique of a fictitious uncontrolled, non-randomized non-blinded small scale clinical study. It was truly a fictitious study. I made it up…
Alright, I give up. I'm getting out the popcorn. It's a Friday night, and it's on, baby! It's so on that I'm breaking one of my blogging rules and writing up a blog post on Friday night, which is when I usually try to relax. I suppose that it helps that I'm working tonight anyway, with a grant…