Science Mag on Science Blogs

You know what they say about great minds.

In the April 14 issue of Science Magazine, two environmental scientists opine that scientists can, and must, become active bloggers and readers of blogs, for two main reasons. First, hard-blogging scientists will ensure that sound scientific information makes it to a wide public audience (while by shunning blogging, the scientific community will cede the conversation to other voices and other interests). Second, scientists have, in the blogosphere, an unprecedented tool for sharing and soliciting ideas, data, and hypotheses. A blog-literate scientific community, the authors suggest, could work more efficiently and keep its labors more socially relevant.

The article was penned by Alison Ashlin and Richard J. Ladle, of the Oxford University Centre for the Environment. "If environmental scientists ignore online communication platforms such as weblogs," they write,

"we run the risk of creating a generation of eco-illiterate consumers and voters at a crucial time for Earth's diminishing resources. How should we respond to the challenges and opportunities presented by the blogosphere? We suggest the following responses, which are potentially applicable to all science disciplines."

The authors go on to make a number of suggestions regarding the role blogs could play in science. Their recommendations include:

  • Scientists should become active bloggers, in order to increase the amount of accurate information available in the blogosphere
  • Blogging could, in some cases, even be part of a researcher's assigned job duties
  • Science blogs should be used as platforms for "the discussion of new ideas and the dissemination of research findings"
  • Scientists could use blogs as a means of gathering feedback during the early phases of a project
  • Blogs are an immediate way for scientists working on location to share "the excitement of working and living in the field"

Blogs, the authors suggest, are here to stay. They recommend that scientists not wait for the implementation of a peer-review system online, but embrace the blogosphere without a moment to lose.

Link to the article, here.


More like this

Just over a year ago, I joined fellow science bloggers Shelley Batts (Of Two Minds) and Tara Smith (Aetiology) in setting out to catalogue the accomplishments--and pitfalls--of the scientific blogosphere and to explain why people should pay attention. In a sense, we wanted to say "We are the…
From quite early on in my blogging endeavor, I was interested in exploring science blogging, what it is, what it can do, and what it can become. So, check out some of my earliest thoughts on this here and here. Then, over about a month (from April 17, 2006 to May 17, 2006) I wrote a gazillion…
Shelley Batts, Nick Anthis, and Tara Smith authored an article on science blogging which appeared yesterday in PLoS Biology. In their words, We propose a roadmap for turning blogs into institutional educational tools and present examples of successful collaborations that can serve as a model for…
Scientists, as a whole, are very reluctant to write novel ideas, hypotheses or data on blogs, and are very slow to test the waters of Open, Source Publishing. Most of what one finds on science blogs is commentary on other peoples' ideas, hypotheses and data found in journals and mass media. On the…