Model projections of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation for the 21st century assessed by observations

This is about "Model projections of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation for the 21st century assessed by observations" by A. Schmittner, M. Latif, and B. Schneider (here if you have a GRL subscription). Its interesting for two reasons: another data point on the "will the THC shutdown" (no); and because of the way it weights multiple AR4 models.

What they are interested in is the size and probability of a THC slowdown over the coming century. To do this they look at 9 models (some with multiple realisations) from the AR4 archive under SRES A1B. The end result is a weakening of the THC from about 16 to about 12 Sv. They don't say what that does to the temperature, but I think it still leaves warming over Europe.

More interesting to me is the weighting thing: they compare various variables in the models to obs climatology, form a skill score, and then weight the models contribution to the final result by W=exp(-0.5S^2). Weights then vary from 0.04 (ie, almost thrown out) to 2.75 (used). This is a Good Thing to do, because some of the models are not really very good, and just averaging them unweighted fails to reflect this. OTOH, they do point out that the mean result is pretty similar, weighted or not, though the uncertainty range is less for the weighted models.

More like this

Says the World Bank [*]. I could see why an imminently 4 oC world would be problematic. But the problem, as Timmy rather bluntly pointed out, is the report saying it spells out what the world would be like if it warmed by 4 degrees Celsius, which is what scientists are nearly unanimously…
Yes, the review you've all been waiting for. Before I start, let me point out that this has been discussed by WE at WUWT, who has pointed out the obvious problem. It has also been mentioned by KK, though that appears to be more of a meta-discussion about the paper's reception rather than the paper…
Whether its post-IPCC-AR4 fatigue, or a foolish Michaelson-like assumption that we just about know whats going on, but things seem to be rather quiet on the climate front, in terms of real news and results. Which leaves people footling around for something to talk about, and temperature trends over…
From the archives: (19 January 2006) Today's issue of Nature features several interesting articles about the effects of global warming. Two are research articles, with one revising estimates of the expected increase in sea level due to global warming and the other demonstrating how certain…