I just came across an unbelievably crappy argument in a scientific debate between two professors. I must keep the details obscure, but the basic form of the exchange follows.
X: I have discovered that tomatoes were grown in Ireland in the Neolithic.Y: That is highly unlikely. The seeds and leaf remains that form almost the entire base of your assertions belong to turnips. Just check out these pictures for comparison.
X: Professor Y subscribes to an earlier Kuhnian paradigm than myself. Therefore his work is incommensurable with mine, and he is by definition unable to criticise me. I remain convinced that tomatoes were grown in Ireland in the Neolithic.
I tell you people, I am reeling.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Back in August I blogged about a manuscript where a scholar appealed to Thomas Kuhn's old theory of paradigm shifts in order to evade criticism of their work. At the time I couldn't give the real details as I had received the manuscript in my capacity as journal editor.
I've said before that I…
For the final installment of my Dawkins series, let's have a look at what my SciBling, John Wilkins has to say. In this post, Wilkins takes issue with Dawkins' discussion of agnosticism. Dawkins believes that agnosticism is unjustified fence-sitting. Wilkins thinks Dawkins is wrong.
I'm with…
Whoa, this one is a doozy. I dare you — I double-dog dare you — to stay awake through the whole thing.
an open letter biology professor P. Z. Myers
Dear Professor Paul Myers,
I remain absolutely willing to be convinced of the scientific adequacy of the theory of evolution to explain the phenomenon…
I discovered Pondering Pikaia less than a year ago and it has immediately become one of my favourite daily reads. Thus, I was very happy that Anne-Marie Hodge could come to the Science Blogging Conference last month so she could meet with all the other science bloggers in person.
Welcome to A Blog…
But of course we had tomatoes in the Neolithic! That explains why our traditional Irish chilli and bolognese are so good.
I hope that's an Irish Reel.
Someone needs to reread Kuhn.
Mmmmmm. Prehistoric cave tomatoes.
X must be a swede.....
I very sincerely hope Prof. X is not a natural scientist...
"Yes, I know our evaluators say our robot project is a failure, what with the thing bursting into flames whenever we try to turn it on. But that's just because they see it from the perspective of an earlier, obsolete Kuhnian paradigm of course; the project is actually a great success. So you will of course continue our funding, right?"
Seriously, I just don't know what kind of world I live in when
A. Someone with that insane attitude reaches professor-ship
B. Someone who makes such a statment is not immediately asked to pack their bags or check into the nearest rehab...
I wonder what s/he would feel if overhearing two doctors discussing the right treatment and using arguments likte this.
Names! We want names!
Watch out. Professor X might send his X-men after you if you annoy him. Or he may just use his mutant powers to change your mind more...directly.
But seriously, claiming to be on the leading edge of a paradigm shift gets points on John Baez's crackpot index (okay, that's for physicists, but maybe something similar should exist for archaeologists).
When I first read your item I thought you were using "tomatoes/Ireland/Neolithic" as a stand-in for some other debate (which you didn't want to identify because it would out Profs. X and Y), an analogy, in other words. But, most of the writers here are taking your terms literally, so I got to ask, did this turkey really claim tomatoes were grown in Neolithic Ireland?
No, CCBC, your original interpretation was correct.
Marcus, I heard you were dead.
Not at all, here I am.
But Petrus said you were dead, and he's always right.