(I can't find anything wrong on the back end for previous post so let's see if this one is broken, too) :(
update 1.2.3 3.2.1 test complete. error fixed, or so i believe.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This can't be right. As I was perusing the blog a little while ago, I noticed this:
That can't be right, can it? This blog can't be number one by any measure, be it the Healthcare100.com or anything else. It has to be a bug in the software. Top ten, I can believe. Number one, not so much.
But…
[Previous installments: here, here, here, here, here]
After a detour through the meaning of causation and the need to find a substitute for what can't, in principle, be observed (the counterfactual), we are now ready to consider what many of you might have thought would be the starting point,…
People keep sending me this link to an article by Jonah Lehrer in the New Yorker: The Decline Effect and the Scientific Method, which has the subheadings of "The Truth Wears Off" and "Is there something wrong with the scientific method?" Some of my correspondents sound rather distraught, like they'…
Rusty has posted another response on Junk DNA. It's a few days old but I'm just now getting around to answering it. If you're following along, you'll find Rusty's original post here and my response here. The basic assertion up for dispute is Rusty's test for creationism:
Further research will…