Brief Observation on SLA's money troubles

Just about everyone coming back from the business meeting commented on the dire shape of the association's financials. First, times are tough everywhere and association memberships are down across the board. Librarians are being furloughed so there's no extra money there to pay for expenses if their organizations can't.

Second, there's an elephant in the room that no one is mentioning in regards to membership renewals and meeting attendance: some of us haven't gotten over the name change vote and how disaffected we feel as a result of the entire mess. This isn't the reason I didn't go. I did renew my membership. I did so only because of the Physics-Astronomy-Math division and the Chemistry division. It's clear that the association leadership and I really have nothing in common.


More like this

John Dupuis asks some provocative questions; I thought I'd take a stab at answering them, and I encourage fellow SciBlings to do likewise. I quite agree with John when he says that the ferment over publishing models disguises a larger question, "the role of scholarly and professional societies in a…
2100 hrs This is a bit of an experiment for me. First, I haven't done a lot of live blogging. Second, I don't know whether science will play any part in tonight's debate. 2102 Lehrer is introducing. Looks like McCain showed up... Lehrer: quoting Eisenhower, re military and econ strength. Obama:…
Sometimes so many things come up at the same time it becomes difficult if impossible to ignore. Here's just a brief list: An oceanographer came to me and asked to see a print copy of an AGU journal article. If you've followed me here from elsewhere, then you'll know my place of work was mandated to…
There has been a lot of stuff written in response to the Hugo award nomination mess, most of it stupid. Some of it is stupid to such an impressive degree that it actually makes me feel sympathetic toward people who I know are wrong about everything. One of the few exceptions is the long essay by…

That disconnect also showed up in our survey, along with the perception (correct or incorrect) that SLA was spending money on this when the financial climate was already looking grim.

I hope over the next year we hear more from SLA about what they're going to do to improve the association finances, beyond "we're going to review everything."

.: Christina: I know you thought the name change was a bad idea. It didn't pass, we are still SLA. I assume this is the outcome you wanted. How are you feeling disaffected at this point? I'm just curious, I would like you to expand on what you wrote above, to explain what you mean.
- Randy

I missed the business meeting this year partly because I suspected we wouldn't be told the exact state of affairs, so at least they opened up somewhat. I think the core issue is that the association is top-down rather than bottom-up, with most initiatives started at the top that try to gather buy-in (like the "ambassadors" for the name change) rather than looking at the membership and responding to issues that arise at that level, like library closings and layoffs. The proposed name change was a good example of that but I'm sure there are others, like the alignment project.

By Elizabeth Brown (not verified) on 24 Jun 2010 #permalink