Recapping ...

In its latest Greenhouse Gas report, the World Meteorological Organization reminds us again that what really sets Homo sapiens apart from the other animals is an unparalleled talent for procrastination. Brad Johnson of Think Progress summarizes:

... since the global convention in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 at which the nations of the world pledged to prevent dangerous global warming, the intensity of global warming has increased by nearly a third. Most of the increase in pollution has come from the burning of fossil fuels, reaping untold profits for oil and coal magnates at the expense of civilization's future. More than a quarter of all of the carbon pollution produced by the United States has come since then.

Which is why our grandkids will one day turn to us and say "Let's me get this straight: you burned it all?"

More like this

Before the release of vast amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere mainly through the burning of fossil fuels, the atmospheric concentration of this gas was about 300 ppm or a bit more. Soon, that number will be 400 ppm. How soon? Let's see ... it is now Tuesday at about 7pm. Maybe mid morning…
The failure of the negotiators at Bali to reach any kind of agreement on a schedule for reducing greenhouse gas emissions has left many observers wondering if maybe it's time to resort to Plan B. Instead of adapting our industrial economy to the physical realities of radiative forcing and positive…
A series of concerts "bigger than Live Aid" are being planned for July, in a bid to put the subject of climate change before a global audience of two billion, reports the Financial Times. The event, scheduled for July 7, will feature co-ordinated film, music and television events in seven cities…
Logging the Onset of The Bottleneck YearsThis weekly posting is brought to you courtesy of H. E. Taylor. Happy reading, I hope you enjoy this week's Global Warming news roundupskip to bottom Another Week of Anthropocene Antics Sipping from the Internet Firehose...June 24, 2012 Chuckles, Solstice…

Hmm. Since those emails "shockingly" are emails saying things pretty similar to "you farkin' dumbass", how can this latest denier moron complain about the contents?

To be fair - if *we* don't "burn it all", *they* will. And hydrocarbons are an awesome source of energy. Best if civilisation benefits from it, rather than the uncivilised theocracies who are sitting on it all. And seeing as these uncivilised theocracies send our money straight back to us as "investments", we can just nationalise or compulsorily acquire their assets anytime we like, anyway, once we're finished burning all their oil.
Keeping our coal in the ground for future use ccould be a good idea though.

By Vince Whirlwind (not verified) on 22 Nov 2011 #permalink

Who, exactly, are "they"?

Hydrocarbons are an amazing source of energy in the same way as the flesh of a human body when burned is an amazing source of energy (look at lions).

Does this mean we need to stoke the fires?