Euro-update 6: Create your own illusion!

We've been away from the internet for a while now, but finally have a slow connection here in rainy Prague. While in Pisa, however, we were able to avail ourselves of a unique opportunity. The favorite trick of the amateur photographers here is to create the "illusion" of their friend/family member "saving" the tower from falling down, like this, admittedly poor attempt:

i-f032a086bb6d87f00dda2ff13059ee66-pisa1.jpg

I've neglected to instruct Nora on the proper angle to hold her fingers, and I should probably have held the camera lower.

But a different illusion is both easier to create and, I think, more impressive. A similar photo won Best visual illusion for 2007. All it requires is placing two identical photos of the leaning tower side by side. The tower on the right appears to be leaning further:

i-42dce7046ac4104edb4e09dc15ddd812-pisa3.jpg

I built the illusion from a single photo I took myself with no Photoshop trickerations. Any guesses as to why this illusion is so effective? Let us know in the comments.

More like this

Let's suppose you're the proprietor of a European tourist attraction. We're not talking about a Louvre or Uffizi here, or even a Leaning Tower of Pisa. No, you're in charge of a hidden gem: the scenic Church of the Saint No One Has Ever Heard Of, or the lovely little Museum of the Famous Artist…
Rummaging through your bag in search of keys, it's clear that you can recognize objects using just your fingers. But is it easier to recognize the keys if you feel them as if you were going to open to door, or if you encounter the key's teeth in some odd orientation--like pointed straight up?…
This stunning photo was taken not by the Hubble space telescope, but by some guy (Rogelio Andreo) out in the desert. Sure, he needed several thousand dollars in digital camera equipment to do it, but still - that's well within the reach of many hobbyists. Are we seeing a surge in amateur…
"...because today, with cameras as pervasive as they are, there is no such thing really as professional photographers." -Marissa Meyer Before you get irate, I don't actually agree at all with that quote above; I have no talent for photography at all and a tremendous respect for those who do, and…

The left frame of the photo is our reference for the left tower, while the right side of the left tower (which slopes up to the left!) is our reference for the right tower.

It would have to do with the larger expanse of blue between the two pictures. I'd guess that ye olde brain is comparing angle based on relative amount of "free space" on either side of each tower image, so that when the left border of one is merged with the right border of the other, it confuses that comparison. Instead of the brain catching the faint darker vertical line that's the true border, it gauges based on tower-to-tower and makes the right one look far closer to its right border than the left one appears, thus the lean.

I'd bet that even 1/8" of white space between the two would be enough to break the illusion.

By G Barnett (not verified) on 10 Jul 2007 #permalink

G Barnett: You lose that bet. Visit the link referenced in the article (or this) to see the illusion work with whitespace in the middle.

I'm quite impressed with this illusion. It took me several minutes before I realized what I was seeing. For the longest time, I was trying to figure out why two pictures of the tower with slightly different rotations of the camera qualified as an optical illusion. Only later did I realize it was the SAME picture twice!

By Michael Chermside (not verified) on 10 Jul 2007 #permalink

Fascinating what our eyes do or refuse to do. Since I'm an artist I'm very well acquainted with "negative space" and looking at each picture individually as well as comparing the negative spaces in each picture I can logically see they are identical; yet the illusion remains.

By roseindigo (not verified) on 10 Jul 2007 #permalink

I used this visual illusion in a presentation I gave June 6 in Montreal at the 3rd World Congress on Fear of Flying.

I was attempting to show the virtues of using Virtual reality in treating fear of flying, as opposed to cognitive therapy which appears ineffective for substantial proportion of patients. Can you guess why I used this illusion (amongst others)?

BTW, the same day of my presentation the Montreal Gazette published the same photo with a story about its constructors, based at McGill U.

The funniest photo I've seen of the Tower of Pisa didn't actually have the Tower in the photo, which was published in Photography Magazine back in the '90s. It showed a bunch of people scattered on a lawn, seemingly doing Tai Chi moves or some such. It was just a photo taken at the Tower, with the Tower not in the frame, of a bunch of tourists who happened to be striking the "I'm holding up the Tower" pose at that moment.

interestingly, the traditional design of a schooner style sailboat has the rear mast raked slightly more than the forward mast just to counteract this illusion...
some examples for those unfamiliar with the schooner.