More on Perceptual Restoration

Last week's post on perceptual restoration in toddlers brought a lot of speculation from commenters. To answer some of the questions, I thought I'd elaborate a bit here on the phenomenon and how I created the demo.

First, here's the original recording again, with me saying "dinosaur" three times:

In the first case, I edited out the "s" sound, and everyone with normal hearing can hear that. The last "dinosaur" is complete. Did I edit out the "s" in the middle dinosaur?

Most adults believe they hear the "s" sound in cases like this, even if the sound has been edited out: the perceptual system adds in a sound where it doesn't exist.

Indeed, more than half of the respondents to our poll said they had heard an "s" sound, even though in fact the sound was edited out in the second "dinosaur."

But some commenters speculated that an "s" sound was embedded in the sneeze sound effect I created, thus nullifying the effect. The "sneeze" was actually a composite of a fake cough and a fake sneeze (neither sounded realistic enough on its own). Do you hear an "s" in either of these sounds?

Personally I'm not hearing it, but I agree that it's closer to an "s" sound than other sounds I could have inserted. In fact the authors of the study do point out that perceptual restoration doesn't always occur; it's less likely to occur when the inserted sound is less like the sound it replaces. As a demonstration, I've redone the demo below, using a horn sound instead of a sneeze:

Now do you hear the "s" in the second "dinosaur"? I certainly don't. So our commenters who argued that the sneeze sounded a little like an "s" do have some grounds for their belief, but I still think that some of what they thought was an "s" sound was in fact the perceptual restoration effect.

More like this

One of the amazing things about learning language is that children rarely hear language sounds in ideal acoustic environments. Maybe other people are talking in the background, or the dishwasher is running, or the TV is on. Yet somehow children they learn words just the same. By the time we're…
You may have seen this illusion in a post from earlier in the week over at Cognitive Daily, but I thought I'd say a little bit more about it, and talk about a related illusion. First, click play (from Sham's demo site) If the illusion is working -- Dave at Cognitive Daily had a bit of trouble…
Today's reading is "When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception," by Katsumi Watanabe and Shinsuke Shimojo of Caltech (Psychological Science, 2001). In 1997, Sekuler, Sekuler, and Lau discovered a fascinating effect that I've attempted to replicate using the…
Sneezes occupy the attention of flu mavens because the aerosol created is likely one of the chief ways the virus finds a new host. So it's a selective advantage to a respiratory virus to make someone explosively expel air from the lungs through the nose. A sneeze even has a medical name:…

You could run a spectrograph on the cough/sneeze sound and see if it contains the profile of "s" (high-frequency fricative). Humans do seem to map language sounds onto non-language sounds based on shared acoustic principles. You might disambiguate the interference sound from the linguistic "s" by using something with a lower frequency.

Yes, I did notice the 's' that seems to be actually missing in third clip. Looks like you should have chosen a horn rather than a fake sneeze/cough (or maybe even a different word, like infor_ation).