Can we tell who's speaking based only on body movements? Depends on their emotion

Take a look at this video. Your job: decide which person speaks first:

Click to view Video 1 (QuickTime required)

Let's make this a poll:

Now, try another one. Once again, decide which person speaks first:

Click to view Video 2 (QuickTime required)

Make your response here:

ResearchBlogging.orgDavid Rose and Tanya Clark showed videos like this to 17 student volunteers, and asked the same question: who spoke first in each video? The videos are point-light displays, which show movements of particular points on an actor's body, but not the nuances of facial movements and expressions.

The videos were used in an earlier experiment about identifying emotion (which we've discussed on Cognitive Daily). That study showed that people are accurate in identifying emotions in point-light displays. Now they wanted to find out if people can determine who's talking in the same videos. Here are the results:

i-af4b8fefbbd42e587651b10ce3da9291-rose.gif

As you can see, accuracy depends on the emotion being portrayed. The videos depicted actors reading scripts while expressing one of several possible emotions. While in the previous study viewers were able to accurately identify the emotions, this experiment shows that people can't always accurately figure out who's speaking. While angry and joyful conversations were easy to parse, for conversations expressing fear and disgust, respondents didn't do better than chance.

If we duplicated these results in our example, accuracy should be much better for Video 1 (anger) than Video 2 (fear).

Rose, D., & Clarke, T. (2009). Look who's talking: Visual detection of speech from whole-body biological motion cues during emotive interpersonal conversation Perception, 38 (1), 153-156 DOI: 10.1068/p6279

More like this

Point-light displays can tell us an amazing amount about other people. Looking only at a few glowing spots corresponding to joints and set in motion, we can tell what people are doing, whether they are over- or underweight, and even identify a friend among strangers. We can also identify animals or…
Point-light displays are an amazing demonstration of how the visual system creates order out of what initially seems to be a random pattern. Take a look at this short movie (QuickTime required). Just looking at the first frame, it might be difficult to tell what's being displayed, but after…
What's your first reaction on seeing this picture of Nora? Are you excited because she appears to be excited? Or do you react to her intent? Perhaps you think she's cute, or maybe even sarcastic. Ultimately you might have all of those reactions. There's no doubt we're exceptionally fast at…
When we are trying to understand what someone is saying, we rely a lot on the movement of their face. We pay attention to how their faces move, and that informs our understanding of what is said. The classic example of this is the McGurk effect, where the same sound accompanied by different facial…

I had a very hard time telling because the video jumps straight into someone speaking. If there was a second or two of no speech it would be easier to tell I think.

It seems like the difference is between larger and smaller movements. What about the quietly angry people, or people who gesture a lot when they talk, regardless of emotional state?

Video 2 is supposed to be fear? Perhaps it was that I was somehow thinking of it as a follow-up to 1, but I saw it as resignation. It seemed both participants had a bleak sense that nothing else they said would matter.

It's good to see mime research is still getting published.

What if what really made a difference was the performance itself, not the emotion they were trying to portray?

They are both ambiguous to me.

I chose the one who dominates the conversation.

I'm actually kind of surprised that anyone put "left" on the first one. To me it seemed very obvious that it was the guy on the right.

They are both ambiguous to me.I chose the one who dominates the conversation.
Work From Home