The Canadian war on public science, basic research and the free and open exchange of scientific information

You would think that such apple pie issues as public science, basic research and the free and open exchange of scientific information would be hard to disagree with. You would think that a resolution in the Canadian parliament would to such effect would meet with resounding support, resulting in a unanimous vote, the room resounding with shouted Yays.

You would think that anyone who would vote nay to such a resolution would be a virtual pariah in an open democratic society, a society that values an informed citizenry and evidence-based decision making.

Apparently you would be wrong. Apparently Canada has become some sort of Mirror Universe when red is green, good is evil, war is peace, science is superstition, sharing is wrong, communication is risky and silence is speech.

Here is a resolution in the Canadian House of Commons from Wednesday, March 20, 2013. It was sponsored by Kennedy Stewart of the NDP, the MP for Burnaby—Douglas in BC.

That, in the opinion of the House: (a) public science, basic research and the free and open exchange of scientific information are essential to evidence-based policy-making; (b) federal government scientists must be enabled to discuss openly their findings with their colleagues and the public; and (c) the federal government should maintain support for its basic scientific capacity across Canada, including immediately extending funding, until a new operator is found, to the world-renowned Experimental Lakes Area Research Facility to pursue its unique research program.

The motion was defeated 157 to 137, with the NDP and Liberals all supporting and every single Conservative voting Nay. Including the Prime Minister, Stephen Harper.

And most damningly, including Gary Goodyear, the Minister of State for Science & Technology.

The Minister of State for Science and Technology effectively voted against:

  • the free and open exchange of scientific information
  • evidence-based policy-making
  • federal government scientists must be enabled to discuss openly their findings
  • federal government should maintain support for its basic scientific capacity across Canada
  • the world-renowned Experimental Lakes Area Research Facility

And don't get me started on muzzling librarians. Which now that I think of it, is likely the next post.
     
And here are some of my recent posts about the Harper government's war on information in general and science in particular:

(via)

More like this

C. Scott Findlay, associate professor of biology at the University of Ottawa and a visiting research scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, had a sobering article in the Toronto Star a few days ago. It's titled Governing in the dark: Ottawa’s dangerous unscientific revolution and it…
Darrell Bricker and John Ibbitson's book The Big Shift: The Seismic Change in Canadian Politics, Business, and Culture and What It Means for Our Future is pretty obviously not a science book. Rather, it's a book about Canadian politics. But of course here in Canada these days, it's hard to talk…
Now there's a quote for you! Provocative in it's shortsightedness and fairly ignorant of how the interplay between scientific discovery and commercialization/technology transfer works. Commercial products are engineered and developed out of basic scientific discoveries. So who said that? Sadly, it…
I know I've already posted about the changes at the NRC, but this recent David Suzuki article frames the issue so perfectly that I thought I'd post about it again. The article is called National Research Council's new focus ignores how science works. The core issue is that recently the Canadian…

Sounds like the anti-science conservatives in Canada are similar to the ones we have in the States. Sounds like something would do, like the various "Sound science" bills that were a crock.

Keep on preaching! Maybe one day (and I hope it's not too late), we'll throw these b*stards out of power.

It is very discouraging. I wrote my MP and asked why he voted against it. No response yet. I'll be dropping by his office in person next week to find out when he is in town,and ask him to his face.

By Dan Andrews (not verified) on 23 Mar 2013 #permalink

Sounds like the anti-evolutionists in the U.S., Ken "Pork" Ham, Erich Hovind, the professional Con artists (with a capital C), of the American creationist movement.

By Arctodus23 (not verified) on 23 Mar 2013 #permalink

NO WAR, JUST SLUMBER

As is alas often the case, Canada is behind the times. The US, UK and EU are already on the case, fortunately, and Canada will fall in line, if not sooner, then later. Google: ROARMAP and "Open Access Archivangelism"

By Stevan Harnad (not verified) on 24 Mar 2013 #permalink

anyone know what the official reason for voting no is?

By spacediver (not verified) on 24 Mar 2013 #permalink