Around the Web: The math the planet relies on isn’t adding up right now and more on the science and politics of climate change

More like this

The drive to distract us from reality continues. Quite why otherwise sensible people are so keen on stuff like Pressure on Exxon Over Climate Change Intensifies With New Documents - I saw it via Stefan Rahmstorf's fb feed - I don't know, because it is utter drivel. To let Exxon have their rebuttal…
Large ponderous entities like the IPCC or government agencies like NOAA take forever to make basic statements about climate change, for a variety of reasons. They are going to have to speed up their process or risk losing some relevance. Among the coming problems we anticipate with global warming…
Last week it was the disappearing polar ice cap. This week it's the melting permafrost, which contains a heap big quantity of greenhouse gases, which, if released to the atmosphere, "the Kyoto Protocol will seem like childish prattle," according to one expert. But how worried should be really be…
Sipping from the internet firehose...This weekly posting is brought to you courtesy of H.E.Taylor. Happy reading, I hope you enjoy this week's Global Warming news roundup(skip to bottom) Information Overflow is Pattern Recognition June 1, 2008 Top Stories:Buckets, US CCSP, Methane, CDM Doubts,…

Regarding your link to “The Future Role of Economics in the IPCC”,
the IPCC has *always* been about economics,
or rather, about money,
specifically, about wealth redistribution.

“We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.” - Ottmar Edenhofer, the then co-chairman of Working Group III of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

By See Noevo (not verified) on 28 Apr 2016 #permalink