First, Do No Harm, Part IIb

Mike, at The Questionable Authority, has a href="http://scienceblogs.com/authority/2006/07/nation_building_versus_nation.php">valuable
perspective on what
I wrote earlier, in  href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2006/07/first_do_no_harm_part_ii.php">First,
Do No Harm, Part II.  He corrects some of my sloppy
thinking on the matter, plus, he knows more about the subject than I
do.  I replied that, even though he has more direct
information than I do, I still think I am right.



The question is whether we should stay, or get out, of Iraq and
Afghanistan.  I am not claiming to know what we should do, but
I am putting forth my opinion anyway.  I'd be curious to hear
what a neutral third party has to say about the exchange.  Not
that it would settle the matter, but I am sure that there are others
out there with more direct information that could help us figure out
which is the correct perspective.


Tags

More like this

Joseph responded to my last post with a thought-provoking comment on my blog, and added a brief post to his own noting the exchange and wondering if there is any neutral third party who might want to weigh in on our exchange. I'd like to second that request. Of course, since I'm incapable of just…
Krauze has a post up at Telic Thoughts that responds, at least in part, to my post accusing Rob Crowther of dishonesty in his post about Paul Nelson and Karen Armstrong's misquote of him. I didn't mince words. I accused Crowther of telling a baldfaced lie and I stand behind that accusation now.…
My post on the Lancet article has attracted a fair amount of comment, both in the comments here and on other blogs. On the whole, those who have addressed my criticisms have disagreed with them. I've read the criticisms and re-read both the new and the 2004 Iraqi death toll studies a couple of more…
Gleðileg Jól! Another blast from the past of Ye Olde Blogge You're in grad school. Yay. Now wtf do you do... Well, you need to jump through the hurdles first. Most places have some course and seminar requirements, you may in some cases test out of them or waive them, but think about whether you…

If you stay then you're going to lose more troops but, given sufficient resources, you might just be able to make something of these nations.

If you leave then everyone who was willing to stick their head above the parapet - the liberals, the women's rights groups, the members of other religions - are all dead. Period.

Personally, I'd recommend option A. You may be messing your armed forces and economy about, but that's nothing compared to the permanent hit your reputation will take if you walk. Not to mention the fact that all those insurgents in Iraq will have to find a new target...