The "Party" of Fiscal "Responsibility"



It has been a party, sure enough; more like an exercise in
Bacchinalian debauchery.  



href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/22/AR2007052201653.html?hpid=topnews">Changes
Spurred Buying, Abuses




By Robert O'Harrow Jr. and Scott Higham

Washington Post Staff Writers

Wednesday, May 23, 2007; Page A01






...Congress
created the GSA's buying program in 1949 to make it easier for the
burgeoning federal bureaucracy to buy furniture, office supplies and
other products. The government sought to leverage its position as the
world's leading buyer to get the lowest prices...



...In the 1990s, lawmakers and contractors argued that the system was
too cumbersome and the products and services too limited. Congress
began streamlining and expanding the GSA's contracting programs. But
the GSA's inspector general warned that the proposals would weaken
oversight...


One
proposal, to cut back on contract audits, "would strip the government
of one of the most important tools" for detecting overpricing and
"would hand contractors 'carte blanche' to violate contract terms," the
inspector general wrote...




...Over
the next 10 years, information technology spending through the agency
increased tenfold, to more than $17 billion. The number of GSA
officials keeping watch over increasingly complex contracts remained
relatively flat, however, and audits plummeted...



The article points out that the new arrangement allows the GSA to keep
a percentage of every sale.  This resulted in a cozy
relationship between buyer and seller.  The authors go on to
describe specific instances of massive overcharging and lax oversight.
 



GSA
officials declined to comment for this article.



Gee, I wonder why that is?



"This
has been a scandal of great proportions," said David E. Cooper, until
recently the director of acquisition and sourcing management at the
Government Accountability Office, the investigative branch of Congress.
"Our work and the work by the Defense Department inspector general and
the GSA inspector general all show hundreds of millions, if not
billions, that has been wasted."



This is sheer madness.  I cannot believe that the American
People put up with this.



Tags

More like this

“Too often nothing happens,” said John Podesta, Center for American Progress chair and founder, introducing the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pension Majority Committee report released on December 11th that details federal contractors’ repeat and serious occupational safety and wage…
A few weeks ago, we detailed some of the concerns about the review of the chemical Bisphenol-A (BPA) coordinated by the contractor Sciences International for the National Toxicology Programâs (NTP) Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR). The story broke shortly before an…
by Elizabeth Grossman One might assume that when a government agency awards a private company a contract to do construction work - for bridge or sewer work or other public utility repairs, for example - evaluating the company's safety and health record would be a prerequisite. This is, however, not…
Administration Officials Brace for Departures: Important Bush Administration officials are ready to leave the government rather than undergo two years of hell from Democratic committee chairmen in Congress. Leading the exodus are officials of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), fearing…