Another Try at Mental Heath Parity


Insurance companies have discriminated against their mentally ill
customers for years.  Sadly, they have done so with t he
comlicity of the Federal government.  



There have been many attempts to change this, but the attempts
generally are made by constituents who have little power, and meet with little success.



Another attempt is underway.   href="http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=87f720da-802a-23ad-4cb7-acdae2631a38&Region_id=&Issue_id=">Kerry
and Snowe have introduced a bill, href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1715">S.
1715, that would set the copayments for outpatient
psychiatric services at the same level as those for other medical
services.  



From href="http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=87f720da-802a-23ad-4cb7-acdae2631a38&Region_id=&Issue_id=">Olympia
Snowe's href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070627-44&bill=s110-1715#sMonofilemx003Ammx002Fmmx002Fmmx002Fmhomemx002Fmgovtrackmx002Fmdatamx002Fmusmx002Fm110mx002Fmcrmx002Fms20070627-44.xmlElementm7m0m0m">floor
speech:



The
good news is that, today, there are increasingly effective treatments
for mental illness. The majority of people with mental disorders who
receive proper treatment can lead productive lives.



Yet Medicare pays far less for critical mental health services needed
by these beneficiaries than it does for medical treatment for physical
disabilities. Medicare beneficiaries typically pay 20 percent
of the cost
of covered outpatient services, including
doctor's visits, and Medicare pays the remaining 80 percent. However,
this does not apply to outpatient mental health services; here Medicare
law imposes a special limitation, which requires patients to pay a much
higher copayment of 50 percent
. [Emphasis added]



These days it is hard to argue for anything that might
increase Medicare expenditures.  But there are two things to
consider here.  One is the general desirability of fairness.
 The second is that href="http://www.psych.org/psych_pract/offset.cfm">proper
mental health care generally leads to lower medical care expenses,
thus offsetting part of the cost.



More like this

This post is not about mental health parity.  Although it is a very important topic, there is no reason for me to write about it.  If you are interesting in the topic, just go read the (open access) Perspectives column in the current NEJM: href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/2/113…
At the monthly faculty meeting of our cancer center the other day, we had just finished listening to an invited talk by an ethicist about medical technology and the ethics of end-of-life care, when one of my colleagues happened to mention an article in the New York Times about how a perverse…
A New York Times article by Jane Gross highlights a costly healthcare problem: avoidable hospital readmissions, which affect one in five patients and account for $17.4 billion of the current $102.6 billion Medicare budget. (When people talk about readmissions, they're generally referring to an…
It's wonderful to hear what substantial progress US Representative Gabrielle Giffords has made in recovering from the traumatic brain injury she sustained from being shot in the head in January. As the Associated Press reported this morning, Giffords has spent the past five months in a…