1. corpuscallosum
  2. The End of Propaganda?

The End of Propaganda?

By j7uy5 on October 20, 2007.

The FCC is doing something unusual.  Instead of
acting like footsoldiers
for href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/19/opinion/main3385282.shtml">corporate
America,
they are imposing fines on a broadcaster for pushing State-paid
propaganda.  



href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6492542.html">FCC
Pushes Ahead with ‘No Child Left Behind’ Fines

Sonshine, Sinclair Broadcast Group Fined for Airing The
Right Side with Armstrong Williams, America's Black Forum, Respectively

By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 10/18/2007 3:10:00 PM


The Federal Communications Commission
issued its first fines for a station airing Armstrong
Williams’ Department of Education-paid-for plugs for its
“No Child Left Behind” initiative. Station-owner
Sinclair Broadcast Group doesn’t plan to pay the fine and
said it will take the commission to court.



The revelation of those payments caused a firestorm of criticism and a
dressing-down of the DOE, and it led to payola complaints by Free Press
at the FCC.



Remember the story?   href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-06-williams-whitehouse_x.htm"
rel="tag">Armstrong Williams is a journalist, who
was paid by
the US government to promote their education agenda.



What does this mean?  Is the US government giving up on the
idea of propaganda?  Have they pretty much finished their
agenda, and now have no need to unduly influence journalists?
 Or is it that they now have enough journalists who will do it
for free, so they no longer have to pay them?



No, none of that.  It is that href="http://roxanne.typepad.com/rantrave/2007/09/i-never-forget.html">certain
media
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/business/media/03murdoch.html">moguls
have found ways to profit directly from propaganda, so the need for
taxpayer funding is obsolete.  

  



Tags
Propaganda

More like this

Protest of Howl
Preamble via Slashdot: News.com reports that the FCC won't be investigating the phone record disclosures by communications companies under US government pressure. Despite a congressional request for that probe, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin quashed the inquiry based on comments from National…
Elitism and Psychology and Politics
href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/dilbert2033334071113.gif"> Click for full-sized version From: href="http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20071113.html" rel="tag">Dilbert Internet Archive There is elitism, and anti-elitism.  In pure form, both are bad…
The Illusion of Net Neutrality
Jurvetson's Flickr photostream Do you think that there should be universal access to the internet, regardless of how it is accessed? Should the internet be regulated by the federal government? If so, to what extent? Is "Net Neutrality" possible? For now, "neutrality" when it comes to…
November Pieces Of My Mind #1
No, Kim Stanley Robinson, when two groups of characters meet and tell each other what they've gone through recently under the reader's watchful eye, you shouldn't write that dialogue. Because the reader already knows. Back when my father-in-law the engineer had just come to Sweden from China and…

We enter an interesting time, with a different sort of lame-duckism. One of the signs is the number of administration appointees who just now see the need to "move on to other things". Another is the items like this one, where federal agencies are beginning to stand up against administration policies, knowing that they are going to get away with it, because those still in power sense their reduced effectiveness, and are not going to stick their necks out.
And things will get even more interesting -- we've got a long way to go to Nov., 2008.